Robot Posture Control Thruster Rotation Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current robots face challenges in agility and mobility due to increased weight, which requires more components and advanced hardware, leading to higher costs and limited design flexibility, as well as difficulties in environments with weak bearing power.

Innovation Solution

A posture control device for robots using a thruster with a rotation mechanism that supports or hauls the robot's load, allowing for movement in multiple axes, enabling reduced component usage and cost-effective manufacturing while enhancing agility and mobility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the weight of the robot is increased to provide more solidity and stronger torque, then the robot can support heavier loads and perform more robust motions, but the agility and mobility are slowed down and the cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovetorqueVSAvoidagility
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the anti-weight principle by using a thruster to generate upward thrust that counteracts the gravitational force acting on the robot. This thrust supports the weight of the robot, effectively reducing the net force that the mechanical components need to overcome. As a result, the robot can maintain strong torque for robust motions without requiring excessive weight, thereby preserving agility and mobility while reducing manufacturing costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

2Strength

If the weight of the robot is increased to provide more solidity and stronger torque, then the robot can support heavier loads and perform more robust motions, but the number of components increases and manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesolidityVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The thruster provides upward thrust to counteract gravity, reducing the load on the robot's structural components. This allows the robot to maintain solidity and strength without requiring an increased number of support components or advanced hardware, thereby simplifying the overall device complexity while preserving structural integrity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

3Strength

If the weight of the robot is increased to provide more solidity and stronger torque, then the robot can support heavier loads and perform more robust motions, but the time required to perform posture or motion increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesolidityVSAvoidtime to perform motion
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

By using thruster-generated thrust to counteract gravity, the robot reduces the effective weight it must move during posture changes and motions. This allows the robot to maintain structural solidity while significantly reducing the time required to transition between postures or perform motions, as the thruster assists in overcoming gravitational resistance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

4Adaptability or versatility

If advanced components and hardware are used to achieve high-level computation and strong torque, then the robot can perform more complex motions and support heavier loads, but the manufacturing cost increases and design flexibility is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion capabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The thruster provides gravitational counterbalance, allowing the robot to perform complex motions and support loads without requiring expensive advanced components or high-level computation hardware. This approach maintains motion capability and adaptability while using simpler, more cost-effective components, thereby improving ease of manufacture and reducing design constraints

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The thruster-based posture control device reduces weight-related limitations, allowing for a wider selection of components, lower manufacturing costs, and increased agility and mobility, enabling robots to perform various motions effectively in diverse environments.

Implementation Method 1

a thruster configured to generate a propulsive force for supporting or hauling a load of a robot part

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThrust: Rocket

Data Source

PatentUS11110604B2Posture control device for robot and robot having the same
Publication Date: 2021.09.07 JUNG SEUNG WHAN
  • US11110604B2 patent drawing
  • US11110604B2 patent drawing
  • US11110604B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to: a posture control device for controlling the posture of a robot by means of a thruster; and a robot having the same. The posture control device, according to the present invention, comprises: a thruster for generating a propulsive force for supporting or hauling the load of a robot part; and a rotation mechanism installed between the robot part and the thruster so as to enable the robot part to rotate with respect to thruster or the thruster to rotate with respect to the robot part, wherein the rotation mechanism has at least two axes of rotation, wherein the axes of rotation respectively form a right angle. In addition, the robot, according to the present invention, comprises parts having the posture control device provided thereto, and may comprise: a first part and a second part having the posture control device provided thereto; and a bendable or extendable third part for connecting the first part and the second part.