Loaded Robot Obstacle Climbing with Rollover-Aware Motion Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Robots face a risk of rollover when moving with a loaded object due to changes in their center of gravity while bypassing or climbing obstacles, necessitating a method to determine a driving route that considers this factor.

Innovation Solution

A robot system that includes sensors to detect obstacles and load distribution, a processor to calculate entrance angles and velocities to maintain a rollover index within a preset range, and a driving apparatus to execute these controls, simulating routes to prevent rollover during obstacle traversal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the robot moves while loading an object to bypass or climb an obstacle, then the robot's mobility and obstacle-crossing capability are improved, but the center of gravity shifts causing a rollover risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle-crossing capabilityVSAvoidrollover risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system calculates and determines the optimal entrance angle and entrance velocity before the robot actually climbs the obstacle. This preliminary calculation of trajectory parameters ensures that the robot approaches the obstacle with pre-computed safe parameters that maintain center of gravity within stable ranges, preventing rollover before it can occur

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts critical motion parameters including entrance angle, entrance velocity, and trajectory based on real-time detection of obstacle characteristics and current load state. By changing these parameters optimally, the robot adapts its motion to maintain stability while successfully crossing obstacles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If the robot climbs an obstacle with a loaded object, then the obstacle-crossing capability is improved, but the motion control complexity increases due to center of gravity changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle-crossing capabilityVSAvoidmotion control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces complex real-time mechanical balance control with computational methods. A processor calculates the optimal trajectory, entrance angle, and velocity using algorithms that simulate and predict center of gravity behavior, substituting complex mechanical control adjustments with intelligent computational planning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system performs preliminary calculation of the complete climbing trajectory and parameters before execution. By pre-computing the optimal path and motion parameters based on detected obstacle characteristics, the system simplifies real-time control execution while maintaining safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12366865B2Robot and method for controlling same
Publication Date: 2025.07.22 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US12366865B2 patent drawing
  • US12366865B2 patent drawing
  • US12366865B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for controlling a robot includes: controlling a driving apparatus to move the robot to a preset route; detecting an obstacle on the preset route; determining an entrance angle and an entrance velocity with which a rollover index of the robot is maintained within a preset range during climbing the obstacle; and controlling the driving apparatus to climb the obstacle with the determined entrance angle and the determined entrance velocity.