Robot Self-Recovery via Symmetric Module Replacement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Independent robots face challenges in rapidly and efficiently recovering from hardware or software failures, leading to resource wastage and operational disruptions.

Innovation Solution

A robot with symmetrically structured modules and a recovery unit that diagnoses failures, determines recoverability, and performs operations to replace or initialize failed modules, utilizing existing resources for self-recovery, including hardware and software recovery units.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a robot performs continuous operations without dedicated management, then productivity is improved, but reliability deteriorates when failures occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous operation capabilityVSAvoidfailure recovery capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The robot system performs self-diagnosis and self-recovery operations. When a module fails, the system automatically detects the failure through diagnosis units, determines recoverability, and executes recovery operations using remaining functional modules without requiring external intervention, thereby maintaining continuous operation while ensuring reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The robot is divided into multiple independent modules that can be individually diagnosed and recovered. This modular structure allows the system to isolate failures to specific modules while other modules continue to function, enabling continuous operation even when some modules fail

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If recovery operations use dedicated recovery resources, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure recovery capabilityVSAvoidrecovery system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Existing functional modules serve dual purposes: they perform their primary operational functions and also serve as recovery resources for other modules. For example, a functional module can provide replacement components or diagnostic capabilities for failed modules, eliminating the need for dedicated recovery hardware and reducing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If recovery operations are performed rapidly, then productivity is improved, but loss of time for proper diagnosis increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecovery speedVSAvoiddiagnosis time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors module status and maintains diagnostic information in advance. When a failure occurs, the pre-collected diagnostic data and pre-determined recovery procedures enable immediate recovery operations without requiring time-consuming analysis, thus achieving rapid recovery while minimizing diagnosis time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8892250B2Robot and recovery method thereof
Publication Date: 2014.11.18 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US8892250B2 patent drawing
  • US8892250B2 patent drawing
  • US8892250B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are a robot capable of recovering from a failure of one of a plurality of symmetrically structured modules, and a recovery method thereof. When a hardware or software failure occurs, the robot recovers by itself by replacing the failed module with another corresponding module. Accordingly, resources of the robot can be more efficiently utilized.