Robotic Accessor Positioning in Tape Libraries

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional automated tape libraries experience inefficiencies due to the robotic accessor remaining idle for extended periods, leading to increased retrieval times, especially when the last insertion is at an extreme end of the library, as they do not optimally reposition during idle times.

Innovation Solution

A system that includes a controller and memory to compute and position the robotic accessor at an optimal position based on the physical distribution of media in the storage slots, using a calculated 'center of access' during idle periods, minimizing the average time to retrieve media items.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If the robotic accessor remains stationary after completing a media transport task, then the system maintains simplicity in control logic, but the retrieval time for subsequent media items increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretrieval timeVSAvoidcontrol logic complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic accessor performs preliminary repositioning actions during idle periods to move toward the center of access or optimal position before the next media retrieval task is initiated. This advance positioning reduces the movement time required when actual retrieval tasks occur, directly addressing the retrieval time issue while maintaining relatively simple control logic through predetermined movement strategies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of time

If the robotic accessor continuously moves to optimize position, then retrieval time decreases, but energy consumption and mechanical wear increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess timeVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic accessor implements periodic repositioning rather than continuous movement, moving to optimized positions at scheduled intervals or during designated idle periods. This approach reduces energy consumption and mechanical wear by limiting movement to necessary periodic adjustments while still achieving the benefit of reduced access times through strategic positioning at these periodic intervals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Quantity of substance

If deep slot technology is used to increase storage density, then storage capacity per square foot increases, but the distance the robotic accessor must travel increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage densityVSAvoidtravel distance
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic accessor performs preliminary repositioning during idle periods to move toward the center of access or optimal position, reducing the average travel distance required for subsequent media retrieval tasks in deep slot configurations. This advance positioning strategy mitigates the increased travel distance inherent in high-density deep slot storage by ensuring the accessor starts from a strategically advantageous position.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9966102B2Optimally positioning an idle robotic accessor in a tape library
Publication Date: 2018.05.08 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US9966102B2 patent drawing
  • US9966102B2 patent drawing
  • US9966102B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In one embodiment, a system includes a controller for controlling a robotic accessor, and a memory in communication with and/or integrated with the controller for storing information about media and storage slots. The information includes data corresponding to a physical distribution of the media in the storage slots. Logic integrated with and/or executable by the controller is configured to position the robotic accessor at a computed optimal position during an idle period of the robotic accessor, the computed optimal position being based at least in part on at least one of: (a) the data corresponding to the physical distribution of the media in the storage slots, and (b) a center of access calculated using the data corresponding to the physical distribution of the media in the storage slots.