Robotic Arm Control via Detachable Attachment Recognition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing interactive autonomous robots in home environments are limited by fixed hardware configurations, restricting their ability to adapt to new services and user interactions, and require manual configuration changes when attachments are modified.

Innovation Solution

A user interactive electronic system featuring a controllable robotic arm with detachable attachments, equipped with sensors and a control unit that automatically determines the attachment type and adjusts movement patterns based on user behavior and desires, allowing seamless integration of new attachments and services without user intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the robotic device uses a fixed hardware configuration, then the device structure is simple and stable, but the adaptability to new services and user interactions is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to new servicesVSAvoidhardware configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic device is divided into a base unit and detachable attachments. The base unit contains the core components (control unit, sensor arrangement, robotic arm), while attachments are separate modular components that can be detached and reattached as needed. This segmentation allows the system to adapt to new services by simply changing attachments without modifying the core hardware structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The base unit is designed with universal interfaces and standardized connection mechanisms that can accommodate multiple types of attachments. The control unit is programmed to automatically recognize and adapt to different attachment types, enabling a single base unit to support diverse functions through interchangeable attachments rather than requiring dedicated hardware for each service.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If the system requires manual configuration changes when attachments are modified, then the control logic is simple, but the ease of operation is reduced and user experience is degraded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of attachment configurationVSAvoidautomatic configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit is pre-programmed with detection routines and configuration protocols that automatically execute when an attachment is connected. The system proactively identifies the attachment type, loads the appropriate control parameters, and configures the robotic arm movements before the user needs to use the attachment, eliminating the need for manual configuration steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor arrangement provides real-time feedback to the control unit about the attached components and their operational status. This feedback loop enables the control unit to automatically adjust control parameters, movement patterns, and interaction modes based on the detected attachment, creating an adaptive system that self-configures without user intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If the robotic arm uses fixed movement patterns, then the control system is simple and stable, but the adaptability to different attachments and user behaviors is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different attachmentsVSAvoidmovement control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The movement control system transitions from fixed, hard-coded patterns to dynamic, adaptive control. The control unit continuously adjusts movement parameters (speed, trajectory, duration) based on real-time feedback from sensor arrangements and the specific attachment being used. This dynamic control allows the robotic arm to adapt its behavior to different attachments and user interactions automatically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes control parameters (movement speed, position, orientation, duration) based on the detected attachment type and user behavior patterns. Instead of using fixed movement patterns, the control unit modifies parameters dynamically through software configuration, allowing the same hardware to exhibit different movement characteristics depending on the attached component and operational context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11584018B2User interactive electronic system and method for controlling a robotic arm
Publication Date: 2023.02.21 TEENAGE ENG
  • US11584018B2 patent drawing
  • US11584018B2 patent drawing
  • US11584018B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a user interactive electronic system, the user interactive electronic system comprising a robotic arm and at least an attachment detachably affixed to a distal end of the robotic arm. The present disclosure also relates to a method for operating such a user interactive electronic system and to a computer program product.