Robotic Arm Removal Strategy for Inventory Items

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern inventory systems face challenges in efficiently managing large numbers of diverse inventory requests, leading to inefficient resource utilization, long response times, and high costs associated with capacity or functionality changes, limiting their ability to adapt to throughput fluctuations.

Innovation Solution

An inventory system utilizing robotic arms and mobile drive units that can move inventory holders, with a management module coordinating tasks and resource allocation, and sensors detecting item attributes to plan and execute the removal and placement of items on moving surfaces, such as conveyor belts, optimizing the movement and storage of inventory items.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If inventory systems expand capacity or functionality to handle more requests, then throughput increases, but infrastructure and equipment costs increase prohibitively

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidinfrastructure and equipment
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts resource allocation and task routing based on real-time workload conditions. The management module continuously monitors system state and reconfigures task assignments to match current throughput demands, allowing the system to scale capacity elastically without permanent infrastructure additions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Existing inventory system resources are designed to perform multiple functions and handle diverse task types. The system can dynamically repurpose equipment and personnel across different operations (packing, storing, retrieving) based on demand fluctuations, maximizing utilization of current infrastructure rather than requiring dedicated resources for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If inventory systems use traditional resource allocation methods, then system structure remains simple, but resource utilization becomes inefficient leading to long response times

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidtask coordination
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The management module implements continuous feedback loops that monitor task progress, resource availability, and system workload. This feedback drives dynamic reassignment of tasks to optimize resource utilization in real-time, reducing response times while coordinating complex multi-resource operations through data-driven decision making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of incoming requests and pre-positions resources or pre-routes tasks based on predicted workload patterns. By anticipating future demands and preparing resource allocations in advance, the system reduces actual response times without requiring overly complex real-time coordination mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of time

If inventory systems increase manpower and equipment to reduce response times, then throughput improves, but operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidmanpower and equipment
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service mechanisms where the management module automatically optimizes task routing and resource allocation without requiring additional human intervention or oversight. Automated decision-making algorithms dynamically assign tasks to available resources, reducing response times while avoiding the need for proportional increases in supervisory manpower.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters such as task priority levels, resource allocation thresholds, and routing strategies dynamically based on current system state. By adjusting these parameters rather than permanently adding resources, the system achieves faster response times while maintaining stable manpower and equipment levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9926138B1Determination of removal strategies
Publication Date: 2018.03.27 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US9926138B1 patent drawing
  • US9926138B1 patent drawing
  • US9926138B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An item that is moving along a moving surface of an inventory conveyance system may be identified. An orientation of the item with respect to the moving surface may be determined based on sensing information that describes the item and a portion of the moving surface surrounding the item. A removal strategy for operating a robotic arm to remove the item from the moving surface may be determined based at least in part on the item and the orientation. The removal strategy may include a trajectory for the robotic arm to follow as part of removing the item from the moving surface.