Robotic Arm Secondary Tool Integration for Constrained Access

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional robotic manipulators face challenges in accessing constrained work sites, such as enclosed cavities, and complicating robotic controls when additional tools are added, particularly due to issues with computing inverse kinematics, data transfer, and safe operational procedures for multiple arms.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a primary arm with a two-arm linkage, a secondary tool, and a controller that allows the secondary tool to be attached to the primary arm, providing seven degrees of freedom and enabling the primary arm to operate the secondary tool, which can be used for tasks like payload manipulation and maintenance, with the ability to compensate for a complex structure and support power and data transfer.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a secondary tool is added to extend reach into constrained work sites, then accessibility to enclosed cavities is improved, but device complexity increases due to multiple arms and control systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccessibility to constrained work sitesVSAvoidcomplexity of robotic control system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the control systems of the primary and secondary robotic arms into a single integrated controller. The controller receives operator inputs and automatically coordinates both arms, eliminating the need for separate control systems and reducing overall system complexity while maintaining the ability to access constrained work sites.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The controller is designed as a universal system that can control both the primary arm and secondary tool across multiple operational modes. It provides unified control architecture that handles inverse kinematics, data transfer, and operational coordination for both arms simultaneously, reducing the need for multiple specialized control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple robotic arms are used to perform complex manipulations, then task capability is improved, but computing inverse kinematics and coordinating control becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask capability for complex manipulationsVSAvoiddifficulty of computing inverse kinematics
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller automatically performs inverse kinematics calculations for both arms based on operator inputs and current arm configurations. The system self-coordinates the motion of primary and secondary arms, eliminating the need for operators to manually compute complex kinematic solutions and reducing control difficulty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor the positions and configurations of both robotic arms. This feedback enables the controller to dynamically adjust inverse kinematics calculations and coordinate arm movements in real-time, simplifying the control process for complex manipulations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If separate control systems are used for primary and secondary arms, then independent control is improved, but system integration and data transfer architecture become more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindependent control capabilityVSAvoiddata transfer architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines separate control systems into a single integrated controller that manages both primary and secondary arms. This unified architecture simplifies data transfer by eliminating the need for complex inter-system communication protocols while maintaining independent control capabilities through software configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Adaptability or versatility

If additional tools and arms are added to conventional systems, then functional versatility is improved, but safe operational procedures and hazard controls become more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional versatilityVSAvoidcomplexity of safety procedures
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The integrated controller incorporates safety monitoring and coordination functions that automatically detect and prevent hazardous interactions between the primary arm and secondary tool. The system monitors arm positions, velocities, and operational states in real-time, providing automated hazard control that simplifies safe operational procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250018573A1Primary arm and secondary tool combined system
Publication Date: 2025.01.16 MACDONALD DETTWILER & ASSOC INC
  • US20250018573A1 patent drawing
  • US20250018573A1 patent drawing
  • US20250018573A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a system and method for robotic manipulation. The system includes a primary arm having a two arm linkage, a secondary tool, an attachment for attaching the secondary tool to the primary arm, and a controller of the primary arm for operating the secondary tool. The method includes removing a secondary arm from a storage location, securing the secondary arm to the primary arm, and operating the secondary arm with a controller of the primary arm.