Robotic Control Device Battery Charge Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing robotic systems powered by batteries require users to manually calculate and store power consumption data for each operation, which is time-consuming and effort-intensive, and may lead to battery depletion during operation.

Innovation Solution

A control device that automatically determines the upper-limit number of times a robot can execute operations before recharging by repeatedly testing the battery's output voltage and storing this information, allowing the robot to execute operations within a predetermined threshold, thereby managing battery charge without user effort.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the robot stores power consumption information for each operation to manage battery charge, then battery management capability is improved, but user time and effort for calculating and storing data increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery management capabilityVSAvoiduser time and effort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control device automatically acquires power consumption information from the database and calculates the upper-limit number of times without requiring user intervention. The system serves itself by autonomously managing battery charge assessment, eliminating the need for users to manually calculate and store power consumption data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual calculation and data storage operations with an automated control device that queries the database and performs calculations electronically. This substitution of manual mechanical operations with automated electronic processing resolves the contradiction between improved battery management and reduced user time investment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Device complexity

If the robot operates without automatic battery management, then device complexity is reduced, but the robot may stop due to battery depletion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidcontinuous operation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control device continuously monitors battery charge levels and compares them against the threshold value. When the battery charge falls below the threshold, the system provides feedback by notifying the user to recharge, enabling the robot to operate reliably without complex manual intervention while preventing battery depletion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary assessment of battery charge levels before operation begins and continuously during operation. By proactively monitoring and comparing battery charge against the threshold, the system prevents battery depletion before it occurs, ensuring continuous operation without requiring complex emergency management systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Speed

If the robot uses fixed power consumption data, then calculation speed is improved, but adaptability to changing operation content deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalculation speedVSAvoidadaptation to operation changes
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The upper-limit number of times is not fixed but dynamically determined based on the specific operation content and corresponding power consumption data from the database. When operation content changes, the control device recalculates the upper-limit number of times using updated power consumption information, maintaining both calculation efficiency and adaptability to changing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of power consumption data based on the specific operation being performed. By querying the database for operation-specific power consumption values and using these to calculate the upper-limit number of times, the system adapts to different operation contents while maintaining fast calculation through automated parameter retrieval and computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables efficient management of battery charge, preventing robotic system shutdown due to battery depletion and allowing for easy adaptation to changes in operation content, while ensuring the robot can perform multiple types of operations without interruption.

Implementation Method 1

a robot driven using a battery as a power supply source

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBattery (electricity): Battery (electricity)

Data Source

PatentUS11951632B2Robotic system and control device
Publication Date: 2024.04.09 SEIKO EPSON CORP
  • US11951632B2 patent drawing
  • US11951632B2 patent drawing
  • US11951632B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A robotic system includes a robot driven using a battery as a power supply source, and a control device configured to control the robot. The control device executes a setting process of making the robot repeatedly execute a first operation from when the battery is fully charged to when an output voltage of the battery becomes not higher than a predetermined threshold value, and setting a number of times the robot executes the first operation in a range in which the output voltage of the battery is higher than the threshold value as a first upper-limit number of times which is an upper limit of a number of times the robot can be made to execute the first operation in a period from when the battery is fully charged to when the battery is recharged.