Differentiable Robotic Cutting Simulation for Soft Material Cracks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current simulators for robotic cutting of soft materials lack differentiability, requiring manual tuning of simulation parameters and being computationally intensive, and fail to accurately model crack propagation and knife contact forces.

Innovation Solution

A differentiable simulator that augments the finite element method with a continuous contact model based on signed distance fields and a continuous damage model using virtual springs to simulate crack formation, allowing for efficient calibration and optimization of simulation parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If FEM-based simulators are used to simulate continuum mechanics of biomaterial, then physical accuracy is improved, but computational resources increase and manual tuning is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephysical accuracyVSAvoidcomputational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional FEM mechanical computation with a differentiable physics model that uses gradient-based optimization. This substitution allows the simulator to maintain physical accuracy while enabling automated parameter calibration through differentiability, reducing the need for manual tuning and improving computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter representation from discrete mesh elements to continuous differentiable fields. By representing material properties and cutting parameters as differentiable functions, the system enables gradient-based optimization to automatically tune parameters, eliminating manual tuning while maintaining physical accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If remeshing algorithms are used to simulate crack propagation at higher resolutions, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrack propagation resolutionVSAvoidsimulation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex remeshing algorithms with a differentiable crack propagation model. By formulating crack propagation as a differentiable process using continuous fields instead of discrete mesh operations, the system achieves high-resolution crack simulation without the computational complexity of remeshing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If X-FEM is used to simulate crack growth without remeshing, then productivity is improved, but computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimulation speedVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes X-FEM's enrichment functions with a differentiable damage model that uses continuous fields. This substitution maintains the computational efficiency of avoiding remeshing while reducing the computational resources required by leveraging gradient-based optimization and differentiable operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Adaptability or versatility

If purely machine-learning based approaches are used, then adaptability is improved, but measurement precision of physical parameters decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelearning capabilityVSAvoidphysical parameter accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces pure machine learning with a differentiable physics model that combines the adaptability of learning-based approaches with the physical accuracy of physics-based models. By making the physics model differentiable, it enables gradient-based optimization to learn physical parameters while maintaining their physical meaning and measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables precise calibration with real-world data, efficient Bayesian inference, and optimization of cutting forces through lateral slicing motions, improving the accuracy and efficiency of robotic cutting simulations.

Implementation Method 1

a continuous damage model that inserts springs on opposite sides of the cutting plane and allows them to weaken until zero stiffness to model crack formation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 2

The simulator augments the finite element method (FEM) with a continuous contact model based on signed distance fields (SDF)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectContact force: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS20220382246A1Differentiable simulator for robotic cutting
Publication Date: 2022.12.01 NVIDIA CORP
  • US20220382246A1 patent drawing
  • US20220382246A1 patent drawing
  • US20220382246A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A differentiable simulator for simulating the cutting of soft materials by a cutting instrument is provided. In accordance with one aspect of the disclosure, a method for simulating a cutting operation includes: receiving a mesh for an object, modifying the mesh to add virtual nodes associated with a predefined cutting plane, optimizing a set of parameters associated with a simulator based on ground-truth data, and running a simulation via the simulator to generate outputs that include trajectories associated with a cutting instrument. Optimizing the set of parameters can include performing inference based on a set of ground-truth trajectories captured using sensors to measure real-world cutting operations. The inference techniques can employ stochastic gradient descent, stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics, or a Bayesian approach. In an embodiment, the simulator can be utilized to generate control signals for a robot based on the simulated trajectories.