Robotic Drywall Finishing With Modular End Effectors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current drywall finishing processes are inefficient and labor-intensive, lacking automation in planning, cutting, hanging, mudding, sanding, and painting, which leads to inconsistencies and increased time and cost in construction projects.

Innovation Solution

An automated drywall finishing system utilizing a robotic arm with modular end effectors for tasks like cutting, hanging, coating, sanding, and painting, integrated with vision systems and sensors for precise planning and execution, enabling automated mixing, application, and drying of coatings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated robotic systems are implemented for drywall finishing, then productivity and consistency are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrywall finishing speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated drywall finishing system is divided into distinct modular components: a robotic arm for positioning, separate end effectors for different operations (mudding, taping, finishing), and independent control systems. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently while working together to achieve high productivity through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The robotic arm serves multiple functions by equipping different end effectors for various drywall finishing operations including mudding, taping, and surface finishing. This multi-functionality reduces the need for multiple separate automated systems, managing device complexity while maintaining high productivity across all finishing tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Manufacturing precision

If manual drywall finishing processes are used, then device complexity is low, but manufacturing precision and consistency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefinish quality consistencyVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated drywall finishing system incorporates sensors that continuously monitor the finishing process and provide real-time feedback to the control system. This feedback mechanism enables precise control of the robotic arm and end effectors, ensuring consistent finish quality across all drywall surfaces while managing the complexity through intelligent control algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical finishing operations are replaced with an automated robotic system that uses programmed motion control and sensor-guided positioning. This substitution eliminates human variability in finishing quality while the modular architecture and software control manage the inherent complexity of the automated system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If automated coating application is implemented, then productivity and coating uniformity are improved, but use of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoating application speedVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The automated coating application system uses periodic spraying cycles with controlled pause intervals, allowing the coating material to settle and reducing the need for rework. The robotic arm moves in programmed periodic patterns, applying coating in controlled passes rather than continuous operation, which optimizes energy usage while maintaining high productivity and uniform coating quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Manufacturing precision

If automated mixing and application systems are used, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoating mixture consistencyVSAvoidmixing and application system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the mixing function and application function into a single integrated automated platform. The mixing system is directly coupled with the robotic application system, allowing real-time coordination between mixing parameters and application parameters. This integration ensures consistent coating mixture quality while managing complexity through unified control software that coordinates both functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11905719B2Automated wall finishing system and method
Publication Date: 2024.02.20 JLG IND INC
  • US11905719B2 patent drawing
  • US11905719B2 patent drawing
  • US11905719B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of generating a building assembly that includes spraying a coating material onto a plurality of pieces of substrate disposed on a first assembly face. The spraying includes spraying the coating material onto the plurality of pieces of substrate via a sprayer configured to apply the coating material to a target surface via a nozzle coupled with a mobile storage container storing the coating material, the coating material impregnating voids of the substrate. The method also includes allowing the coating material impregnating the voids to dry and harden and become rigid to generate the building assembly.