Robotic Drywall Sanding With Surface Feedback and Task Planning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing drywall installation and finishing processes are labor-intensive and lack automation, particularly in tasks such as cutting, hanging, mudding, sanding, and painting, which can be inefficient and inconsistent.

Innovation Solution

An automated drywalling system utilizing a robotic arm with modular end effectors for cutting, hanging, mudding, sanding, and painting, equipped with sensors, vision systems, and a control system to perform these tasks with precision and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated robotic systems are used for drywall installation and finishing, then productivity and precision are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrywall installation efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic arm system is designed to perform multiple drywall operations including cutting, hanging, mudding, sanding, and painting through interchangeable end effectors. This multi-functionality consolidates what would otherwise require multiple separate devices into a single automated platform, improving productivity while managing complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The automated drywalling system is divided into modular components including the robotic arm, base unit, control system, and interchangeable end effectors. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and facilitates easier maintenance and programming, addressing the complexity issue while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Manufacturing precision

If automated sanding is implemented, then manufacturing precision and quality control are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesanding qualityVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated sanding system incorporates sensors and control systems that provide real-time feedback on surface conditions. This feedback mechanism allows the robotic arm to adjust sanding parameters dynamically, ensuring consistent manufacturing precision and quality control while managing complexity through automated closed-loop control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses automated planning and execution capabilities where the control system independently manages the sanding process based on pre-programmed parameters and real-time sensor data. This self-service approach reduces the need for manual intervention and maintains high precision while keeping the operational complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If modular end effectors are used for different tasks, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask versatilityVSAvoidend effector system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic arm is designed with a universal mounting interface that accommodates various end effectors for different drywall tasks. This universality allows the system to adapt to different operations (cutting, hanging, mudding, sanding, painting) without requiring multiple specialized robotic systems, improving versatility while managing complexity through standardization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The end effector system is designed to be dynamically reconfigurable, allowing operators to change tools based on task requirements. This dynamic adaptability is managed through standardized interfaces and control systems that automatically adjust parameters when effectors are changed, improving versatility while keeping the switching process simple and systematic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP3600790B1Automated drywalling sanding system
Publication Date: 2026.04.22 CANVAS CONSTRUCTION INC
  • EP3600790B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3600790B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3600790B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An automated sanding system that includes a robotic arm and a sanding end effector coupled at the distal end of the robotic arm, with the sanding end effector configured to sand a target surface. The system can further include a computing device executing a computational planner that generates instructions for driving the sanding end effector and robotic arm to perform at least one sanding task that at least includes the sanding end effector sanding a target surface, the generating based at least in part on obtained target surface data; and drives the end effector and robotic arm to perform the at least one sanding task.