Robotic Joint Tunable Actuator Energy Recovery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Robotic systems face challenges in minimizing power consumption while maintaining adequate force output, often requiring costly high-output power systems or inefficient low-force systems, and struggle to effectively utilize energy sources due to limited portable power capabilities.

Innovation Solution

A robotic joint system with a tunable actuator joint assembly incorporating a primary actuator and a quasi-passive linear pneumatic actuator, which stores and releases energy to provide a secondary torque, optimizing energy use and compensating for gravitational forces, and featuring a valve that defaults to an open position for safety and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If high-output power systems are employed to meet force output demands, then force output capability is improved, but power consumption and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce output capabilityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The pneumatic actuator operates in periodic cycles, storing energy during compression phases and releasing it during expansion phases. This periodic action allows the system to meet high force output demands only when needed, rather than continuously operating high-power systems, thereby reducing overall power consumption while maintaining force capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system recovers energy by capturing and storing pneumatic energy during phases when force is not immediately needed, then recovering and utilizing this stored energy when force output is required. This energy recovery mechanism reduces the need for continuous high-power input while maintaining force output capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

2Use of energy by moving object

If efficient power systems are employed to improve energy efficiency, then power consumption is reduced, but force output capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidforce output capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs pneumatic actuators that use compressed gas to generate mechanical force. Pneumatic systems can deliver high force output when needed while consuming less energy during idle or low-demand periods, thus improving energy efficiency without sacrificing force capability. The compressible nature of gas allows for energy storage and release cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters by switching between different power states - using stored pneumatic energy for high-force operations and relying on passive or low-power states for maintenance positions. This parameter switching allows the system to achieve high energy efficiency during low-demand periods while maintaining the capability for high force output when required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If portable power sources are used to enable mobility, then operational autonomy is improved, but power output capability and duration are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational autonomyVSAvoidpower output capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and separates the energy storage function into a dedicated pneumatic energy storage system, allowing the main power source to be smaller and more portable. By extracting the high-energy-density storage into pneumatic tanks, the system achieves better portability while maintaining the capability for high power output when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-compressing and storing pneumatic energy before it is needed. This allows portable power sources to be smaller since the high-energy-density storage is achieved through pre-compression rather than requiring large battery capacity, thus improving portability while maintaining power output capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Use of energy by moving object

If passive pneumatic actuators are used to reduce power consumption, then energy efficiency is improved, but control precision and responsiveness deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from a static passive pneumatic actuator to a dynamic semi-active system where the pneumatic pressure can be adjusted in real-time based on control requirements. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to maintain high energy efficiency through passive pneumatic operation while achieving active control precision when needed by modifying pneumatic parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback control by monitoring the state of the pneumatic actuator and adjusting pneumatic pressure accordingly. This feedback mechanism allows passive pneumatic actuators to achieve precise control by using pressure regulation as the control variable, thus improving control precision without sacrificing the energy efficiency of passive pneumatic operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves improved power-to-output energy efficiency, reduces power consumption, and enhances safety by defaulting to an inactive state upon power loss, allowing for controlled movement and reduced risk of uncontrolled rotations.

Implementation Method 1

The piston compresses the gas in the compression chamber to cause the quasi-passive linear pneumatic actuator to store energy upon a first rotation of the first and second support members about the joint and to release energy upon a second rotation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas compression and expansion: Compression

Implementation Method 2

a valve in fluid communication with the gas passageway that selectively restricts flow through the gas passageway

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas flow restriction: Valve

Implementation Method 3

compensating for gravitational forces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitation: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS11717956B1Robotic joint system with integrated safety
Publication Date: 2023.08.08 SARCOS CORP
  • US11717956B1 patent drawing
  • US11717956B1 patent drawing
  • US11717956B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A robotic joint system with integrated safety can include a first support member, a second support member, and a tunable actuator joint assembly including a joint having an axis of rotation about which the first support member and the second support member rotate. The tunable actuator joint assembly can include a primary actuator and a quasi-passive linear pneumatic actuator coupled between the first and second support members. The quasi-passive linear pneumatic actuator can comprise an active state in which the quasi-passive linear pneumatic actuator stores energy upon a first rotation of the first and second support members and releases energy upon a second rotation of the first and second support members opposite the first rotation, and an inactive state that facilitates return of the first and second support members to a default position.