Robotic Applicator for Paint Defect Repair

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual paint defect repair processes in vehicle manufacturing are inefficient due to human error, leading to inconsistent material application and resource wastage, which affects the quality and efficiency of the painting process.

Innovation Solution

A system and method utilizing a robotic applicator with a dispenser and end effector, capable of identifying paint defects and atomizing a composition for precise application, ensuring a controlled and repeatable amount of material is applied directly to the defect, minimizing waste and improving repair consistency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual polishing process is used with human operators, then flexibility and adaptability are maintained, but material application consistency and precision deteriorate due to human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual operation flexibilityVSAvoidmaterial application consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical polishing with an automated robotic system that uses a controlled dispensing mechanism and automated polishing tool. The system substitutes human operators with a robot equipped with a dispenser for applying polish and a polishing tool with controlled motion, eliminating human error while maintaining operational capability through automated control systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The robotic system performs the polishing operation autonomously without continuous human intervention. The robot independently positions the polishing tool, controls polish application through the dispenser, executes the polishing motion, and manages the entire repair cycle self-service style, improving both precision and efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If excessive polish is applied during automated repair, then complete coverage of the defect is achieved, but material waste increases and cleanup requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect coverage completenessVSAvoidpolish material waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where sensors detect the actual polish application and the robot adjusts subsequent dispensing based on this information. The system monitors polish consumption and defect treatment progress, using this feedback to optimize material application and prevent both over-application and under-application of polish

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The robotic system dynamically adjusts critical parameters including polish dispensing rate, polishing tool speed, downforce pressure, and motion path based on real-time conditions. These parameter changes allow the system to apply precisely the right amount of polish needed for each specific defect, eliminating waste while ensuring complete coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If manual polishing is used, then complex defect patterns can be adapted to, but repair time and labor intensity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect pattern adaptabilityVSAvoidrepair cycle efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic system employs dynamic motion control that allows real-time adjustment of polishing paths, speeds, and patterns. The robot can adapt its motion dynamics to accommodate various defect geometries and locations, maintaining versatility while executing repairs at consistent, optimized speeds that improve overall productivity compared to manual operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system enables efficient and repeatable paint defect repair, reducing material waste and labor-intensive cleanups, while maintaining high-quality finishes by ensuring precise application of the repair composition directly to the defect area.

Implementation Method 1

The dispenser can be configured to atomize a composition into an atomized composition. The dispenser can be also configured to dispose a predetermined amount of the atomized composition on the paint defect.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAtomization:

Data Source

PatentUS20240359200A1System and method for defect repair
Publication Date: 2024.10.31 ENCORE AUTOMATION LLC
  • US20240359200A1 patent drawing
  • US20240359200A1 patent drawing
  • US20240359200A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for repairing a paint defect of a part can have means for identifying the paint defect of the part, a robotic applicator, and a computer module. The robotic applicator can include a dispenser and a pad. The robotic applicator can be configured to position the dispenser and the pad adjacent to the paint defect of the part. The dispenser can be configured to atomize a composition into an atomized composition. The dispenser can be also configured to dispose a predetermined amount of the atomized composition on the paint defect. The pad can be configured to work the predetermined amount of the atomized composition on the paint defect. The computer module can be in communication with the robotic applicator. The computer module can be configured to control functions of the robotic applicator.