Dual-End Roller Shaft for Fast Abrasive Section Replacement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The current method of replacing abrasive sections on roller shafts in food peeling devices is time-consuming and labor-intensive, as only one end can be accessed, leading to significant downtime and lost profits.

Innovation Solution

A roller shaft design with two accessible ends and a hydraulic system allows for easy replacement of abrasive sections by sliding new sections onto the shaft, using a retainer block and hydraulic cylinder to push worn sections off, eliminating the need to remove additional sections.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single-end access design is used for roller shafts, then the structure is simpler, but the replacement time of abrasive sections increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroller shaft structureVSAvoiddowntime for abrasive section replacement
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The roller shaft is divided into multiple independent abrasive sections that can be individually replaced. Each section is separated by spacers, allowing the shaft to be segmented into modular units that can be accessed and replaced independently from either end of the roller shaft.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The design transitions from single-end access to dual-end access by adding retention members at both ends of the roller shaft. This dimensional change in accessibility allows operators to approach the roller shaft from either end, effectively doubling the access points and reducing replacement time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If multiple abrasive sections are used on a roller shaft, then the abrasive material utilization is improved, but the difficulty of replacing worn sections increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveabrasive material utilizationVSAvoidabrasive section replacement process
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The roller shaft is divided into multiple independent abrasive sections that can be individually replaced. Each section is separated by spacers, allowing the shaft to be segmented into modular units that can be accessed and replaced independently from either end of the roller shaft.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The retention members at each end of the roller shaft can be independently removed to extract specific abrasive sections that need replacement. This allows worn sections to be taken out without removing the entire roller shaft or other functional sections, simplifying the replacement process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Ease of operation

If the roller shaft is removed from the peeling chamber for section replacement, then access to abrasive sections is gained, but the downtime increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess to abrasive sectionsVSAvoiddowntime during replacement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The retention members are designed to be quickly removable without requiring complete disassembly of the roller shaft assembly. This preliminary preparation of the retention mechanism allows operators to rapidly access and replace abrasive sections while the roller shaft remains in place, minimizing downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The retention members at each end of the roller shaft can be independently removed to extract specific abrasive sections that need replacement. This allows worn sections to be taken out without removing the entire roller shaft or other functional sections, simplifying the replacement process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution reduces downtime by enabling quick and efficient replacement of abrasive sections on both ends of the roller shaft, minimizing downtime and maintaining productivity.

Implementation Method 1

a hydraulic cylinder that pushes the abrasive material section onto the roller shaft thus forcing the other abrasive material sections to slide along the shaft

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic force: Hydraulic Press

Data Source

PatentUS20070000392A1Roller shaft for a vegetable peeler
Publication Date: 2007.01.04 VANMARK EQUIPMENT LLC
  • US20070000392A1 patent drawing
  • US20070000392A1 patent drawing
  • US20070000392A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An improved roller shaft for a food peeling machine that allows for an improved method of changing abrasive sections that are on the shaft, the improved shaft having a first and second end with removable retaining elements and the method involving the use of a hydrostatic cylinder to place a new abrasive section on the roller shaft thus causing the most worn section to slide off the shaft.