Two-Part Rotary Die Encapsulation for Multi-Phase Uniformity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional rotary die encapsulation processes face challenges in maintaining content uniformity for multi-phase formulations due to phase segregation, which can lead to manufacturing issues and formulation instability, particularly when dealing with systems that have different densities or large particle sizes, and require high viscosity to prevent segregation.

Innovation Solution

A two-part rotary die encapsulation system and method that separately formulates and controls the introduction of each phase, using independent mechanical dispensing mechanisms to minimize phase segregation and ensure precise dosing, even with low viscosity multi-phase systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If the viscosity of multi-phase formulation is increased to prevent phase segregation, then content uniformity is improved, but manufacturing problems occur such as high line loss and pump metering issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent uniformityVSAvoidmanufacturing problems
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the multi-phase formulation into separate phases and processes them independently through separate dispensing mechanisms, then combines them during encapsulation. This segmentation prevents phase segregation while avoiding the need to increase overall formulation viscosity, thereby eliminating manufacturing problems associated with high viscosity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the processing parameters by controlling the timing and sequence of phase introduction rather than altering the fundamental viscosity parameter of the formulation. Each phase is dispensed at controlled rates independently, maintaining content uniformity without requiring high viscosity that would cause manufacturing issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Stability of the object's composition

If rheology-modifying excipients are added to prevent phase separation, then content uniformity is improved, but undesirable properties are introduced such as slowed dispersion and adverse stability effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent uniformityVSAvoidundesirable properties
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and removes the need for rheology-modifying excipients by using a different approach - independent mechanical dispensing of each phase. This eliminates the harmful effects of excipients such as slowed dispersion and adverse stability while still achieving content uniformity through precise control of phase incorporation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces a mechanical dispensing mechanism as an intermediary between the multi-phase formulation and the encapsulation process. This intermediary device controls the introduction of each phase separately, achieving content uniformity without relying on chemical excipients that would introduce harmful properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If a single dispensing pump is used to inject fill composition, then the process is simple, but phase segregation occurs leading to content uniformity issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess simplicityVSAvoidcontent uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the single dispensing function into multiple independent dispensing mechanisms, each handling a specific phase. This increases device complexity slightly but dramatically improves content uniformity by preventing phase segregation through independent control of each phase's introduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces dynamic control capabilities where each dispensing mechanism can independently adjust its dispensing rate and timing. This dynamic control allows the system to adapt to the specific properties of each phase, maintaining content uniformity while providing precise control over the encapsulation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves uniform multi-phase encapsulation with minimal API content variability, reduces the need for rheology-modifying excipients, and minimizes damage to processing equipment, while allowing in-situ adjustment of API dosage strength.

Implementation Method 1

in instances when the fill system is comprised of multiple phases that can settle or separate prior to being injected between the ribbons

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase separation: Sedimentation

Implementation Method 2

the motion of the liquid can impart centrifugal forces that can cause an otherwise homogenous system to segregate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Data Source

PatentUS20250302699A1Two part rotary die encapsulation system and process for manufacturing capsules
Publication Date: 2025.10.02 R P SCHERER TECH INC
  • US20250302699A1 patent drawing
  • US20250302699A1 patent drawing
  • US20250302699A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are a rotary die encapsulation system and process for manufacturing capsules and uses thereof. The rotary die encapsulation system and process may be used for improving content uniformity of a multi-phase fill composition in a capsule. The rotary die encapsulation system and process may also be used for tuning dose strength of a fill composition in a capsule.