Rotatable Hood Radiator Access for All-Terrain Vehicle Maintenance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current all-terrain vehicles (ATVs) lack optimal ergonomic design and performance for operating in wet and muddy terrains, such as lakes and streams, where water and mud predominate, leading to reduced functionality and reliability.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a robust frame with adjustable front and rear suspensions, a radiator positioned for easy access, and a winch system, along with a rotatable hood for maintenance access, and uses rubber air ducts that require fewer clamps for assembly, enhancing durability and ease of maintenance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If the radiator is positioned in the front frame subassembly, then cooling performance is improved, but access for maintenance becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradiator cooling performanceVSAvoidradiator access for maintenance
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The hood is designed to be rotatable between a closed position (enclosing the radiator for protection and optimal cooling airflow) and an open position (providing access for maintenance). This dynamic structure allows the system to adapt between operational and maintenance states, resolving the contradiction between cooling performance and maintenance accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the hood is designed to enclose the radiator, then protection and aerodynamics are improved, but access for maintenance is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradiator protectionVSAvoidradiator access
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The rotatable hood provides a dynamic solution that allows the ATV to operate in two distinct states: enclosed for protection and aerodynamics during operation, and open for maintenance access. This resolves the contradiction by making the structure adaptable to different operational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Strength

If multiple clamps are used for air duct assembly, then connection strength is improved, but assembly complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveair duct connection strengthVSAvoidnumber of clamps for assembly
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The air duct assembly uses fewer clamps by optimizing the duct design and mounting locations. This merging approach consolidates connection points while maintaining sufficient connection strength, reducing assembly complexity without sacrificing structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Strength

If the frame is designed with vertical members and rearwardly extending members, then structural strength is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveframe structural strengthVSAvoidframe subassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The frame is segmented into a main frame portion and a front frame subassembly. This segmentation allows the complex structural requirements (vertical members for winch mounting and rearwardly extending members for radiator support) to be met while enabling modular assembly and maintenance, reducing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10946736B2All-terrain vehicle
Publication Date: 2021.03.16 POLARIS IND INC
  • US10946736B2 patent drawing
  • US10946736B2 patent drawing
  • US10946736B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An ATV is shown having a radiator that is coupled to the frame forward of and a hood is rotatably coupled to the frame and having an open position providing access to the radiator and a closed position enclosing the radiator.