Rotor Blade Test Fixture Minimizing Tip Deflection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fixtures and methods for load testing of rotor blades in rotorcraft are inadequate in controlling tip deflection during axial or centrifugal load testing, leading to imprecise measurements and inability to accommodate long blades or those with weight pockets, which affect test results.

Innovation Solution

A fixture system with a structural frame assembly and pivotal linkage assemblies, including pitch and flap actuators, that minimizes tip deflection of rotor blades during testing, allowing for precise axial load measurements and accommodating weight pockets.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If axial or centrifugal loads are applied to the rotor blade during testing, then the load-carrying capability is tested, but the tip of the rotor blade twists and deflects, adversely affecting the axial or centrifugal loading characteristics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload-carrying capability verificationVSAvoidaxial load measurement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The fixture applies preliminary counteracting forces through its structural design to offset the twisting and deflection caused by axial or centrifugal loads. The rigid frame and positioning mechanisms pre-establish constraints that prevent tip displacement during load application, ensuring accurate measurement conditions are maintained throughout the test.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The fixture acts as an intermediary between the load application system and the rotor blade. It transfers and distributes the applied loads while maintaining precise control over blade positioning and orientation, isolating the measurement system from the adverse effects of blade deflection and twisting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If known fixtures are used to control tip deflection, then measurement precision is improved, but only very short rotor blades or partial rotor blades can be tested

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaxial load measurement precisionVSAvoidrotor blade length accommodation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The fixture incorporates adjustable and configurable components that can be dynamically adapted to accommodate different rotor blade lengths. The structural design allows modification of support positions, clamping locations, and measurement point configurations, enabling the same fixture to precisely test blades of varying lengths from short to full-size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The fixture is designed with universal capabilities to handle multiple rotor blade configurations. It can accommodate full-size rotor blades with adjustable support spans, configurable clamping mechanisms, and adaptable measurement systems, making it suitable for testing various blade types and lengths without requiring specialized fixtures for each case.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Stability of the object's composition

If weight pockets are added to balance the rotor blade, then flight performance is improved, but test results of axial or centrifugal load testing are affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotor blade balanceVSAvoidtest result accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The fixture design isolates the weight pockets from interfering with the load measurement process. By carefully positioning support points and measurement devices, the system extracts or separates the balancing function (performed by weight pockets) from the load testing function, ensuring that the presence of weight pockets does not contaminate the axial or centrifugal load test results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The fixture applies localized measurement and support at specific critical points on the rotor blade, away from the weight pocket locations. This ensures that the balancing masses do not interfere with the local stress and strain measurements, maintaining test accuracy while allowing the weight pockets to perform their balancing function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP3363742B1Fixture, system, and method for testing loads in a flexible aerodynamic member
Publication Date: 2019.10.30 THE BOEING CO
  • EP3363742B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3363742B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3363742B1 patent drawingFigure 4A

AI summary

A fixture (10), system (300), and method (400) are provided for testing (63) one or more axial loads (64a) in a flexible aerodynamic member (12). The fixture (10) has a structural frame assembly (70) with a first end portion (72), a second end portion (74), and an intermediate portion (76). The fixture (10) has a first pivotal linkage assembly (90) pivotable about a pitch axis (92), a pair of pitch actuators (114) to apply a pitch moment (116a) to the first pivotal linkage assembly (90), a second pivotal linkage assembly (120) pivotable about a flap axis (122), and a pair of flap actuators (140) to apply a flap bending moment (116b) to the second pivotal linkage assembly (120). The fixture (10) has a third pivotal linkage assembly (150) pivotable about the pitch axis (92), and has a pair of chord actuators (166) to apply axial load (64a) to the flexible aerodynamic member (12). The fixture (10) minimizes deflections (66) of a tip (28) of the flexible aerodynamic member (12) during testing to provide an improved accuracy (67) of axial load measurement data (68a).