Laminated Rotor Chamfers Prevent Smearing During Machining

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Laminated rotor structures in electric machines face issues with stress concentration, excessive radial runout, and smearing due to machining, which can lead to mechanical failure and electrical contact between laminations, and are costly and time-consuming to produce.

Innovation Solution

The use of chamfers on laminations, filled with insulating material, to prevent smearing and stress concentration, along with a stack of laminations held in compression by stud members and end flange members, providing necessary bending stiffness and torque transmission.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If machining is performed on laminated rotor surfaces to avoid stress concentration and reduce radial runout, then mechanical strength and rotor balance are improved, but smearing occurs causing electrical contact between laminations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strengthVSAvoidelectrical insulation
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Chamfers are pre-formed on the lamination surfaces before assembly, creating a geometric feature that prevents smearing during subsequent machining operations. This preliminary geometric modification ensures that the tooling does not contact the insulating coating, thereby maintaining electrical insulation while still allowing necessary machining for stress concentration relief and runout correction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The chamfer acts as an intermediary geometric feature between the machining tool and the insulating coating. By providing a transition edge, the chamfer mediates the interaction between the tool and the coating, allowing the tool to remove material for stress relief without directly contacting and smearing the insulating layer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Strength

If solid single-forging rotors are used to provide required bending stiffness, then mechanical strength and stiffness are improved, but production cost and lead time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebending stiffnessVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The rotor body is segmented into multiple thin laminations stacked together, replacing the solid single-forging structure. This segmentation allows for easier manufacturing of individual laminations, reduced production costs, and shorter lead times, while the stacked configuration maintains the required bending stiffness through proper stacking and compression.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The rotor uses a composite structure of multiple laminated sheets bound together, creating a composite material system that achieves the mechanical properties of solid steel while benefiting from the manufacturing advantages of laminated construction. The composite lamination stack provides both the required stiffness and cost-effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Manufacturing precision

If multiple machining operations are performed on assembled rotor, then stress concentration and radial runout are reduced, but smearing increases causing electrical contact between laminations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradial runoutVSAvoidsmearing
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Chamfers are pre-formed on the laminations before assembly, creating a geometric feature that prevents smearing during subsequent machining operations. This preliminary geometric modification ensures that the tooling does not contact the insulating coating, thereby maintaining electrical insulation while still allowing necessary machining for stress concentration relief and runout correction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution reduces the likelihood of smearing and stress concentration, improves rotor balance, and decreases production costs and lead times by using a more efficient and cost-effective laminated rotor design.

Implementation Method 1

chamfers on the laminations to reduce smearing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInsulation: Dielectric

Implementation Method 2

the stack of laminations is held in compression by a series of rods that pass through holes in the periphery of the laminations

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Implementation Method 3

the rotor rotating about a longitudinal axis within the stator to convert mechanical energy into electrical energy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentEP2730008B1Laminated rotor machining enhancement
Publication Date: 2023.06.07 GENERAL ELECTRIC TECH GMBH
  • EP2730008B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2730008B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2730008B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The rotor for an electrical machine comprises a plurality of stacked laminations (415). Each lamination (415) includes a plurality of radially extending slots (140) arranged about a circumference thereof and a first chamfer (520) on a surface (550) of each of the slots (140), wherein the surface (550) mates with a wedge (150). The first chamfer (520) connects the surface (550) and a first face (418) of the lamination (415). Advantage: Avoiding electrical contact between laminations due to smearing when the wedge mating surface (550) of the assembled rotor must additionally be machined.