Aircraft Rotor Blade Proximity Control via Sensor Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Tilt-rotor and rotor-wing aircraft experience coning or flapping, causing rotor blades to displace relative to non-rotating components, leading to potential unsafe proximity issues, which existing solutions address through pilot training and aerodynamic adjustments that increase weight and impact performance.

Innovation Solution

A flight control system with proximity sensors (ultrasonic, LiDAR, pressure, or tripwire) measures rotor blade positions relative to non-rotating components and initiates corrective actions via actuators or servo motors when blades approach a minimum safe distance, ensuring safe clearance without weight penalties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If rotor assembly is extended further away from non-rotating components, then rotor blade clearance is improved, but aircraft weight increases and aerodynamics are negatively impacted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotor blade clearanceVSAvoidaircraft weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical solution of extending the rotor assembly with an electronic control system. Proximity sensors detect the distance between rotor blades and non-rotating components, and the flight control computer automatically adjusts flight parameters to maintain safe clearance, eliminating the need for additional structural extensions that would increase weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors rotor blade proximity to non-rotating components using sensors and provides real-time feedback to the flight control computer. This closed-loop control enables dynamic adjustment of flight parameters to maintain safe clearance without requiring permanent structural modifications that would increase aircraft weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If rotor assembly is extended further away from non-rotating components, then rotor blade clearance is improved, but aerodynamic performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotor blade clearanceVSAvoidaerodynamic performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical solution of extending the rotor assembly with an electronic control system. Proximity sensors detect the distance between rotor blades and non-rotating components, and the flight control computer automatically adjusts flight parameters to maintain safe clearance, eliminating the need for additional structural extensions that would disrupt aerodynamics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If pilot training and flight control software are used to address rotor blade clearance, then operational procedures are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational proceduresVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables the aircraft to monitor and adjust its own rotor blade clearance automatically through proximity sensors and flight control computer integration. This self-service capability reduces reliance on pilot training and manual procedures, simplifying the overall system by automating the clearance management function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively maintains safe rotor blade clearance without adding weight, improving aerodynamics and reducing the risk of collisions by dynamically adjusting flight parameters in response to real-time blade positions.

Implementation Method 1

The proximity sensor can comprise one or more of an ultrasonic sensor, a pressure sensor, a LiDAR sensor, or a tripwire

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUltrasonic sensor: Ultrasound

Implementation Method 2

The proximity sensor can comprise one or more of an ultrasonic sensor, a pressure sensor, a LiDAR sensor, or a tripwire

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure sensor: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 3

The proximity sensor can comprise one or more of an ultrasonic sensor, a pressure sensor, a LiDAR sensor, or a tripwire

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLiDAR sensor: LIDAR

Implementation Method 4

at least one of an actuator and a servo motor electrically coupled to the flight control computer, the at least one of the actuator and the servo motor operable to control a flight parameter

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectActuator: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS10583916B2Method and apparatus for proximity control between rotating and non-rotating aircraft components
Publication Date: 2020.03.10 TEXTRON INNOVATIONS INC
  • US10583916B2 patent drawing
  • US10583916B2 patent drawing
  • US10583916B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The aircraft includes a rotor. The rotor includes a plurality of rotor blades. The aircraft further includes a non-rotating aircraft component. A proximity sensor is disposed with at least one of the non-rotating aircraft component and the rotor blades. A flight control computer is electrically coupled to the proximity sensor.