Round Gemstone Facet Layout for Brilliance and Weight Retention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing gemstone cutting techniques require complex facet arrangements that increase the risk of damage during production and result in weak lines and suboptimal performance, appearance, and appeal, while also being difficult to simplify.

Innovation Solution

Novel facet arrangements with simplified cuts and larger facet sizes, enhanced angles between crown and bottom facets, and improved triangular facets near the girdle to enhance brilliance, scintillation, and appearance, while maintaining a high weight ratio.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Illumination intensity

If complex facet arrangements are used to enhance gemstone performance and appearance, then brilliance and scintillation are improved, but the risk of damage during production increases and manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovebrillianceVSAvoidfacet arrangement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The gemstone facet arrangement is segmented into distinct functional zones: crown facets (upper portion), pavilion facets (lower portion), and girdle facets (middle section). Each zone is independently optimized with specific facet counts and angles, allowing complex optical performance to be achieved through modular design rather than monolithic complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the gemstone are assigned different facet qualities and characteristics. The crown features larger facets optimized for light entry and initial refraction, the pavilion features precisely angled facets for total internal reflection, and the girdle features smaller facets for fine-tuning light paths. This local optimization achieves overall brilliance without requiring every facet to be equally complex

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Illumination intensity

If more facets are cut to enhance gemstone performance, then light reflection and refraction are improved, but the risk of damage during production increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight reflectionVSAvoidproduction safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The facet cutting process follows a predetermined sequence where critical facets are established first based on precise angular calculations. The crown facets and main pavilion facets are cut to predetermined angles before finer adjustments, allowing the majority of light reflection performance to be achieved with fewer, more critical cuts rather than numerous incremental adjustments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs accelerated cutting methods for non-critical facets where precise angular optimization is less important. Certain secondary facets and girdle facets are rapidly established at approximate angles, skipping the time-consuming iterative adjustment process, thereby reducing overall production time and exposure to damage risk while maintaining adequate optical performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

3Illumination intensity

If traditional facet arrangements are used to achieve desired performance, then optical performance is maintained, but weight retention decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical performanceVSAvoidweight retention
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent systematically varies critical parameters including facet angles (e.g., crown angle, pavilion angle, girdle angle), facet sizes, and facet positions to optimize the balance between optical performance and weight retention. By adjusting these parameters within specific ranges, the design achieves adequate brilliance with less material removed during cutting

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Rather than optimizing every facet to maximum precision, the patent applies partial optimization to the most critical facets (crown and pavilion) while using good-enough approximations for less critical facets (girdle and secondary facets). This selective approach achieves satisfactory optical performance with reduced material waste

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Ease of manufacture

If simplified facet arrangements are used to reduce production complexity, then manufacturing is easier, but gemstone appearance and performance are degraded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting simplicityVSAvoidgemstone appearance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSIllumination intensity

Solution Approach 1:

The facet arrangement is segmented into standardized patterns that can be replicated across multiple gemstones. The crown, pavilion, and girdle each have defined facet configurations that can be systematically applied, making the cutting process more straightforward while maintaining consistent optical performance across production batches

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs universal facet angle standards and proportional relationships that work across different gemstone sizes and types. These universal principles allow simplified cutting procedures to produce consistent optical results without requiring custom optimization for each individual stone, bridging the gap between manufacturing simplicity and performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The new facet arrangements improve gemstone performance and appearance by increasing weight retention, simplifying facet arrangements, and enhancing brilliance and scintillation, with a potential 9% greater yield from rough crystals.

Implementation Method 1

Light dispersion, is a term describing the refraction of white light into its spectrum of wavelengths in color, from facets refracting light rather than receiving or reflecting it.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRefraction: Refraction

Implementation Method 2

Scintillation or 'sparkle', is the reflection of a light source off the surface of a gemstone's facets, interacting with a viewer's eye relative to the angle of viewing the gemstone.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentEP4243648B1Gemstone cut
Publication Date: 2026.01.28 WEITMAN ZEV WOLF
  • EP4243648B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1C
  • EP4243648B1 patent drawingFigure 1D~1E
  • EP4243648B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2C

AI summary

A gemstone cut into a round or modified round shape have a total of 81 facets. The gemstone includes a crown and a bottom separated by a girdle. The crown includes a table surrounded by 16 star facets. The 16 star facets are surrounded by 8 primary bezel facets, and 8 secondary bezel facets. The 8 primary and secondary bezel facets are surrounded by 16 primary upper girdle facets such that the crown has a total of 48 facets surrounding the table. A bottom of the gemstone has a culet surrounded by 8 primary and 8 secondary pavilion facets. The 8 primary and secondary pavilion facets are surrounded by 16 lower girdle facets therebetween. The bottom has a total of 32 facets surrounding the culet. Including the table this gemstone may have a total of 81 facets which may be surrounded by the girdle.