Safety Control Evaluation Unit for Dynamic Danger Zone Setting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing safety-relevant function control systems for machines face challenges with fast movements, requiring generously sized danger zones and error-free machine recognition, which can lead to inefficiencies and reduced precision in safety assessments.

Innovation Solution

Direct communication between the machine control and evaluation unit allows for precise setting of danger zones using control signals, enabling smaller, dynamically defined zones even at high speeds, and consideration of object and machine data for tailored safety measures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the sensor measures position and speed to set the danger zone, then the danger zone can be dynamically adjusted, but at high machine speeds the measurement time causes delays that require generously sized danger zones

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedanger zone setting precisionVSAvoidmeasurement time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit receives future position and/or speed data from the machine control in advance before the machine actually reaches those positions. This allows the evaluation unit to pre-calculate and set the danger zone based on anticipated machine states, eliminating the time delay associated with real-time measurement and ensuring the danger zone is already properly configured when the machine arrives at high speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the danger zone size based on the machine's future speed and position data. When high speeds are anticipated, the danger zone is automatically enlarged in advance; when lower speeds are expected, the danger zone is reduced. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by making the danger zone size responsive to actual machine conditions rather than using fixed conservative margins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If the sensor is used to sense machine data for danger zone setting, then the system can operate with existing components, but the machine must be recognized error-free by the sensor which reduces reliability at high speeds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidmachine recognition reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention introduces the machine control as an intermediary between the machine and the evaluation unit. Instead of the sensor directly measuring machine position and speed, the machine control receives future position and speed data from the machine control unit and transmits this information to the evaluation unit. This intermediary approach improves reliability because control systems are designed to handle high-speed data accurately, whereas sensors may struggle with error-free recognition at high speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If generously sized danger zones are used to ensure safety at high speeds, then safety is maintained, but the working zone utilization is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidworking zone utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by setting different danger zone sizes in different spatial locations and time moments based on the machine's specific future position and speed data. Instead of using a uniformly generous danger zone throughout the working area, the evaluation unit calculates precise, location-specific danger zones that are only enlarged where and when actually needed for safety, thereby maximizing working zone utilization while maintaining safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS7623031B2Method and apparatus for the control of a safety-relevant function of a machine
Publication Date: 2009.11.24 SICK AG
  • US7623031B2 patent drawing
  • US7623031B2 patent drawing
  • US7623031B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus for the control of at least one safety-relevant function of a machine is described having a machine control for the control of the movements of the machine, having at least one sensor for the sensing of an object inside a monitored zone and having an evaluation unit for the setting of a danger zone and for the triggering of the safety-relevant function on the intrusion of the sensed object into the danger zone. To set the danger zone, the evaluation unit is coupled to the machine control and the evaluation unit is designed for the derivation of the parameters required for the setting of the danger zone starting from the control signals used by the machine control for the movement control of the machine. A corresponding method is furthermore described.