Machine Tool Safety Device with Multidimensional Hazard Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Panel-sizing circular saws pose a risk of injury due to violations of occupational health and safety regulations, with existing safety devices often impairing workflow, causing false triggering operations, and being ineffective for cutting electrically conductive materials or in unpredictable situations, and they lack ergonomics and sufficient functionality to prevent injuries quickly.

Innovation Solution

A panel-sizing circular saw with a detection device that uses multidimensional hazard detection (distance, direction, speed, and acceleration) coupled with a safety device that initiates appropriate safety measures, such as speed reduction or mitigation element deployment, to prevent injuries, and a control system that selects safety measures based on the detected hazard level.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing safety devices are used to detect hazardous situations, then injury prevention is improved, but workflow is impaired and false triggering operations occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinjury preventionVSAvoidworkflow
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The safety system dynamically adjusts the circular saw blade's operational state based on real-time hazard detection. The control device can progressively reduce blade speed or trigger mitigation element deployment only when necessary, rather than always stopping the blade. This dynamic response prevents unnecessary workflow interruptions while maintaining safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The safety response is segmented into multiple levels: warning signals, speed reduction, and mitigation element deployment. This segmentation allows the system to respond proportionally to the detected hazard level, preventing false triggering from causing complete workflow shutdowns while still providing adequate safety for actual dangers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Device complexity

If simple safety devices are used, then device complexity is reduced, but they are ineffective for cutting electrically conductive materials or in unpredictable situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety device structureVSAvoidhazard detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The detection device is designed with multi-functionality to detect various hazard types including electrical conductivity changes, unexpected movements, and proximity to the blade. By integrating multiple detection capabilities into a single system, the patent achieves versatile hazard detection without proportionally increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system monitors changes in electrical parameters (conductivity) and mechanical parameters (movement, position) to detect different hazard conditions. This parameter-based detection approach allows the same detection device to handle diverse scenarios including conductive materials and unpredictable situations by recognizing parameter deviations from normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of time

If safety measures are initiated quickly to prevent injury, then response time is improved, but the system may trigger falsely in atypical situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidfalse triggering
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary hazard assessment by continuously monitoring multiple parameters before initiating safety measures. The control device evaluates detected conditions against predetermined criteria and can issue progressive responses (warning, speed reduction) before full mitigation, allowing time to distinguish between actual hazards and atypical but safe situations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The detection device provides continuous feedback to the control device about hazard conditions. This feedback loop allows the system to monitor the situation dynamically and adjust the response accordingly, reducing false triggering by confirming hazard persistence and evaluating the context of detected conditions before initiating safety measures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11052544B2Safety device for machine tools
Publication Date: 2021.07.06 ALTENDORF GMBH
  • US11052544B2 patent drawing
  • US11052544B2 patent drawing
  • US11052544B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A safety device for machine tools, such as a panel-sizing circular saw or an edge-gluing machine, with a machining tool used for machining a workpiece supplied to the machine tool, comprises a detection device and a hazard reduction device. The detection device is designed to detect a hazardous situation of an operator of the machine tool and the hazard reduction device is designed to initiate a safety measure to reduce the risk of injury to the operator when a hazard signal characterizing a hazardous situation of the operator is received.