Supercritical Fluid Extraction with Integrated Pressure Exchanger

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing supercritical fluid (SCF) extraction processes require full depressurization to remove insoluble compounds, leading to increased cycle time, energy consumption, and mechanical stress, with no commercial method to efficiently separate soluble and insoluble compounds while maintaining high pressure.

Innovation Solution

The use of an integrated pressure exchanger in the SCF extraction process allows for the continuous recycling of SCF by adjusting pressure differentials, enabling the separation of soluble and insoluble compounds without depressurization, thus reducing energy consumption and cycle time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If full depressurization is used to remove insoluble compounds, then separation is achieved, but cycle time increases and energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation efficiencyVSAvoidcycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the separation process into two distinct stages: (1) pressure reduction to separate insoluble compounds while maintaining supercritical conditions for soluble compounds, and (2) subsequent full depressurization only for the soluble compound stream. This segmentation allows insoluble compounds to be removed without complete depressurization, reducing cycle time while maintaining separation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary separation step using a separator vessel that operates at intermediate pressure conditions. This intermediary device enables partial separation of insoluble compounds before final depressurization, allowing the system to achieve separation goals without subjecting the entire process to repeated full depressurization cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If full depressurization is used to remove insoluble compounds, then separation is achieved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation efficiencyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the energy-intensive depressurization step to apply only to the soluble compound stream after insoluble compounds have been removed. By separating the insoluble compounds at intermediate pressure, the system avoids the energy cost of depressurizing the entire mixture repeatedly, thereby reducing overall energy consumption while maintaining separation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the presence of insoluble compounds from a hindrance into a benefit by allowing them to be separated at higher pressures where their physical properties differ significantly from the supercritical fluid. This approach transforms what would normally require energy-intensive filtration after depressurization into a pressure-driven separation that occurs naturally during the pressure reduction phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Productivity

If repeated depressurization and pressurization cycles are used, then SCF is recycled, but mechanical stress on structure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveSCF recyclingVSAvoidmechanical structure stress
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the pressure cycling into two distinct phases: (1) a controlled pressure reduction phase that stops before complete depressurization to separate insoluble compounds, and (2) a selective repressurization phase that only repressurizes the soluble compound stream. This segmentation reduces the frequency and magnitude of full pressure cycles, thereby reducing mechanical stress on the extraction vessel while maintaining SCF recycling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic pressure control where the pressure reduction is adjusted to stop at an intermediate level optimized for insoluble compound separation. This dynamic approach allows the system to adapt pressure levels to specific separation needs rather than undergoing rigid full cycles, reducing unnecessary mechanical stress on the structure while maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Manufacturing precision

If additional processing steps are used to remove soluble and insoluble compounds, then separation is achieved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompound separationVSAvoidprocess steps
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the separation of insoluble compounds with the existing pressure reduction step used for soluble compound extraction. By utilizing the pressure reduction phase for dual purposes—both extracting soluble compounds and separating insoluble compounds—the system achieves enhanced separation functionality without adding independent processing equipment or steps, thereby avoiding increased device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent makes the pressure reduction step multi-functional by designing it to simultaneously achieve soluble compound extraction and insoluble compound separation. This universal approach allows a single process step to perform multiple separation functions, eliminating the need for additional dedicated equipment and maintaining device simplicity while improving overall separation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables efficient, cost-effective, and continuous SCF extraction and recycling, minimizing downtime for maintenance and reducing waste streams, while maintaining high pressure and supercritical conditions.

Implementation Method 1

The use of an integrated pressure exchanger in the SCF extraction process allows for the continuous recycling of SCF by adjusting pressure differentials

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

In typical supercritical fluid extraction processes, the SCF is heated and pressurized above the critical point to transform a sub-critical fluid into its supercritical phase. When the SCF makes contact with a solid or liquid substrate the target molecule and/or compound from within the solid or liquid substrate is extracted

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSupercritical fluid extraction: Supercritical Fluid Extraction

Data Source

PatentUS20250050240A1Supercritical fluid extraction process with integrated pressure exchanger
Publication Date: 2025.02.13 KHREIBANI JAMES
  • US20250050240A1 patent drawing
  • US20250050240A1 patent drawing
  • US20250050240A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Processes and apparatuses for compound recovery using supercritical fluid (SCF) are disclosed. An example process involves solvent extraction (including hydrothermal liquefaction and gasification) of a extracted compound using a SCF from a solid or liquid substrate including, but not limited to, microalgae, plant matter, and polymers. The apparatus comprises SCF, an extraction vessel, a pressure exchanger, feedstock, a separate compound, and solid or liquid compound separators.