SCR Catalyst NOx Control via Urea Vaporization Dynamics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current selective catalytic reduction (SCR) systems for internal combustion engines face challenges in controlling nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions due to slow urea doser dynamics, ammonia slip issues, and inadequate accounting for urea vaporization and hydrolysis, leading to suboptimal NOx reduction and increased emissions.

Innovation Solution

The system employs a NOx reduction target module, ammonia target module, reductant target module, and reductant limiting module to determine and adjust the amount of ammonia and reductant injection based on real-time NOx reduction requirements, considering factors like SCR catalyst temperature, NOx composition, and predicted reaction rates, to optimize NOx conversion efficiency and minimize ammonia slip.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If urea dosing is used to generate ammonia for NOx reduction, then NOx conversion rate is improved, but ammonia slip increases due to slow urea doser dynamics and inadequate accounting for urea vaporization and hydrolysis

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveNOx conversion rateVSAvoidammonia slip
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The control mechanism continuously monitors exhaust conditions and adjusts urea dosing rates based on real-time feedback from sensors, dynamically adapting to changing engine operating conditions to optimize NOx reduction while preventing ammonia slip

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system accounts for temperature-dependent vaporization and hydrolysis rates of urea, adjusting the chemical conversion parameters in real-time based on exhaust gas temperature to accurately predict ammonia availability and prevent both insufficient reduction and excess ammonia slip

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-generated harmful factors

If time delay method is used to prevent excess ammonia slip during NOx spikes, then ammonia slip is reduced, but NOx reduction efficiency decreases due to delayed urea injection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveammonia slipVSAvoidNOx reduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calculations of urea vaporization and hydrolysis rates before actual dosing occurs, using predicted reaction rates and stored ammonia capacity data to determine optimal injection timing that prevents both ammonia slip and maintains reduction efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control strategy dynamically adjusts urea dosing timing and rate based on real-time engine operating conditions, transitioning between different control modes (e.g., ammonia storage mode, ammonia release mode) to optimize performance under varying temperature and load conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If urea dosing rate is increased to meet high NOx reduction demands, then NOx conversion is improved, but urea consumption increases leading to higher costs and potential ammonia slip

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveNOx conversionVSAvoidurea consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The SCR catalyst utilizes its own stored ammonia capacity to meet transient NOx reduction demands without requiring proportional increases in external urea dosing, allowing the system to self-regulate based on internal ammonia reserves and exhaust conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances NOx reduction efficiency, reduces ammonia slip, and optimizes urea consumption by accurately determining and adjusting reductant injection, thereby meeting stringent emissions standards.

Implementation Method 1

selective catalytic reduction (SCR) systems are utilized to convert NOx (NO and NO2 in some fraction) to N2 and other compounds. SCR systems utilize a reductant, typically ammonia, to reduce the NOx.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelective catalytic reduction: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

many systems utilize an alternate compound such as urea, that vaporizes and decomposes to ammonia in the exhaust stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVaporization: Evaporation

Implementation Method 3

urea, that vaporizes and decomposes to ammonia in the exhaust stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDecomposition: Decomposition (biological)

Implementation Method 4

the ammonia is utilized to reduce NOx

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Data Source

PatentUS8161730B2Apparatus, system, and method for reducing NO.sub.x emissions on an SCR catalyst
Publication Date: 2012.04.24 CUMMINS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INC
  • US8161730B2 patent drawing
  • US8161730B2 patent drawing
  • US8161730B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments of an apparatus, system, and method are disclosed for reducing NOx emissions on an SCR catalyst. For example, according to one representative embodiment, an apparatus for reducing NOx emissions in an engine exhaust includes a NOx reduction target module that is configured to determine a NOx reduction requirement that includes an amount of NOx in the exhaust gas stream to be reduced on a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalyst. The apparatus also includes an ammonia target module that is configured to determine an ammonia addition requirement that includes an amount of ammonia added to the exhaust gas stream to achieve the NOx reduction requirement. The apparatus also includes a reductant target module that is configured to determine a reductant injection requirement that includes an amount of reductant added to the exhaust gas stream to achieve the ammonia addition requirement. The apparatus further includes a reductant limiting module that is configured to determine whether at least one reductant limiting condition is met and to limit the amount of reductant added in response to the at least one reductant limiting condition if the at least one reductant limiting condition has been met.