Vehicle Seat Rail Pair with Planar Support Face for Torsional Rigidity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing seat rail pairs for vehicle seats lack sufficient stability and loadability, particularly in crash scenarios, due to inadequate design features that limit displacement and absorb loads effectively.

Innovation Solution

A seat rail pair design featuring a lower rail with a C-shaped profile and an upper rail with a U-shaped profile, where roller members are arranged in raceways, with a planar support face on the upper rail's end portions contacting the roller members, enhancing strength, tolerance compensation, and stability by increasing torsional rigidity and transverse and vertical stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If roller members are arranged in raceways between the lower rail and upper rail, then the seat rail pair achieves smooth displacement and load distribution, but the stability and torsional rigidity are insufficient without additional structural features

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesmooth displacementVSAvoidtorsional rigidity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The upper rail features a planar support face on its end portions that contacts the roller members, creating a defined geometric relationship between the curved roller paths and the rail structure. This planar face provides a stable reference surface that prevents lateral deviation while allowing smooth rolling motion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The C-shaped profile of the lower rail with downwardly bent end portions and the U-shaped profile of the upper rail with upwardly bent end portions create a three-dimensional interlocking structure. This multi-dimensional geometry provides stability in both transverse and vertical directions while accommodating the roller members' movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Manufacturing precision

If the upper rail has upwardly bent end portions guided in the lower rail's external profile portions, then the displacement path is limited and positioning is defined, but the loadability in crash scenarios is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning accuracyVSAvoidloadability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The planar support face on the upper rail's end portions provides a large surface area for contact with the roller members, distributing crash loads across multiple contact points rather than concentrating them at single points. This geometric feature enhances the structure's ability to absorb and dissipate impact energy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The C-shaped and U-shaped profiles with bent end portions create a three-dimensional load path that distributes forces in multiple directions. The interlocking geometry provides structural reinforcement that enhances loadability during crash scenarios while maintaining precise positioning during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Strength

If the lower rail has a C-shaped profile with downwardly bent end portions and the upper rail has a U-shaped profile with upwardly bent end portions, then the structural strength is improved, but the tolerance compensation capability is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidtolerance compensation
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The planar support face on the upper rail provides a forgiving contact surface that can accommodate variations in roller member positioning and rail alignment. This geometric feature compensates for manufacturing tolerances by providing a stable contact interface that maintains proper function even with slight dimensional variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The three-dimensional C-shaped and U-shaped profiles with bent end portions create an interlocking structure that accommodates tolerance variations through its geometric design. The multi-dimensional geometry allows for adjustment and compensation in multiple directions, ensuring proper assembly and function despite manufacturing variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design achieves high strength and stability by allowing for improved tolerance compensation and load distribution, preventing the upper rail from sliding off during torsion and minimizing deformation under vertical loads, thus enhancing overall stability and loadability during crashes.

Implementation Method 1

roller members are arranged in two lower roller member raceways and two upper roller member raceways between the lower rail and the upper rail

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRolling: Roller

Data Source

PatentUS11299072B2Seat rail pair for a vehicle seat
Publication Date: 2022.04.12 KEIPER SEATING MECHANISMS CO LTD
  • US11299072B2 patent drawing
  • US11299072B2 patent drawing
  • US11299072B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A seat rail pair for a vehicle seat is disclosed. The seat rail pair may have a lower rail and an upper rail. The upper rail may be moved relative to the lower rail via mutually engaged profiles. The lower rail may have a substantially C-shaped profile and the upper rail may have a substantially U-shaped profile. Roller members may be arranged between the upper rail and the lower rail to facilitate relative movement.