Segmented Helicopter Rotor Blade with Forward and Back Sweep

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current rotor blade designs for helicopters fail to effectively reduce blade vortex interaction noise during descent flights while maintaining performance, especially in hovering conditions, and do not adequately address the power savings and noise reduction at high speeds.

Innovation Solution

A rotor blade design featuring three aerodynamic sections along the span, with an inner rectangular section, a middle forward-swept section, and an outer back-swept section with a parabolic leading edge, optimized to minimize vortex interaction and drag, using a multi-linear twist law and anhedral to shift thrust from the outer to the inner section, reducing tip vortex intensity and drag.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If non-linear twist is applied to the outboard end of the blade, then blade vortex interaction noise is reduced, but power savings decrease at high speed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade vortex interaction noiseVSAvoidpower savings
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The blade is divided into multiple sections (inner section from R0 to R1, middle section from R1 to R2, outer section from R2 to tip) with different geometric characteristics. The middle section has forward sweep while the outer section has back sweep, allowing each section to be optimized for different flight conditions. This segmentation enables the blade to reduce noise in descent flight while maintaining power savings in forward flight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different sections of the blade are given different local geometric properties. The inner section has rectangular or tapered shape, the middle section has forward sweep, and the outer section has back sweep with parabolic leading edge. This local differentiation allows the blade to achieve noise reduction where needed while preserving performance characteristics in other regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Force

If radical increase in twist is applied in central region, then lift capability is improved, but stalling limits cannot be pushed back

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelift capabilityVSAvoidstalling limits
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The blade incorporates a multi-linear twist law that varies the twist angle differently across various radial sections. The twist is optimized in the middle section to improve lift capability while the outer section's back sweep and parabolic leading edge prevent excessive twist from causing stalling, thus dynamically balancing lift enhancement with stall prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Object-affected harmful factors

If forward-swept and back-swept zones are created, then noise is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovenoiseVSAvoidblade geometry complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The outer section of the blade features a parabolic leading edge shape that smoothly transitions from the middle section. This curved geometric approach achieves noise reduction through the back sweep effect while maintaining aerodynamic smoothness, reducing the complexity compared to sharp angular transitions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

4Productivity

If thrust is shifted from outer to inner section, then hovering performance is improved, but forward flight performance may be penalized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehovering performanceVSAvoidforward flight performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The blade is segmented into three distinct sections with different geometric optimizations. The inner section is designed for hovering performance with appropriate twist and chord characteristics, while the outer section with back sweep and parabolic leading edge is optimized for forward flight. This segmentation allows the blade to excel in hovering while minimizing penalty in forward flight compared to uniform designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design significantly reduces blade vortex interaction noise and improves performance in hovering flights with minimal penalty in forward flight, aligning with ecological awareness goals by minimizing noise and drag, thus enhancing helicopter acceptance and efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

the noise of helicopters in descent flight is dominated by the blade vortex interaction noise. The blade vortex interaction noise occurs when the rotor blade interacts with vortices generated by previous blades

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVortex: Vortex Ring

Implementation Method 2

A rotor blade design featuring three aerodynamic sections along the span, with an inner rectangular section, a middle forward-swept section, and an outer back-swept section with a parabolic leading edge

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerofoil: Aerofoil

Data Source

PatentUS9061758B2Noise and performance improved rotor blade for a helicopter
Publication Date: 2015.06.23 AIRBUS HELICOPTERS DEUT GMBH
  • US9061758B2 patent drawing
  • US9061758B2 patent drawing
  • US9061758B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A noise reduced and performance improved rotor blade (1) for a helicopter. The blade has three aerodynamic sections (5, 6, 7) along the blade span between a leading edge (8) and a trailing edge (9). An inner rectangular or tapered section (5) next to a blade root for said blade's connection to a rotor hub rotating about a rotor axis of said helicopter. A middle section (6) is adjacent to the inner section (5) and opposed to the blade root. The middle section (6) is forward swept over a distance along the span of the blade (1). An outer section (7) lies between the middle section (6) and the blade tip (11). The outer section (7) is back swept along a further part of the span of the blade (1). The outer section (7) includes a parabolic shape towards the free end of the blade tip (11).