Self-balancing Foot Platform with Adjustable Telescoping Connector

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing self-balancing transportation devices with fixed foot platform positions fail to accommodate varying riding preferences and struggle with navigating obstacles, as both wheels contact bumps simultaneously, leading to instability and potential rider displacement.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of independently movable foot platform units with a telescoping connector structure that allows adjustable lateral distance and fore-aft movement, enabling one wheel to encounter obstacles first, allowing weight shifting and improved stability during traversal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the foot platforms are fixed in position, then the device structure is simple, but it cannot accommodate different riding preferences and performs poorly when encountering obstacles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccommodation of riding preferencesVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The foot platforms are made movable relative to the wheel assembly, allowing dynamic adjustment of platform position and spacing. The platforms can move fore-aft and laterally to adapt to different riding preferences and obstacle conditions, transforming the static structure into a dynamic adaptive system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The device is divided into separable components: two independently movable foot platforms and a wheel assembly. This segmentation allows each platform to be independently positioned and adjusted, providing versatility while maintaining manageable structural complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If both wheels contact bumps simultaneously, then the fixed wheel position provides structural stability, but the rider is thrown forward causing instability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability during obstacle traversalVSAvoidrider control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The foot platforms can move independently fore-aft relative to the wheel assembly, allowing the rider to position one platform ahead of the other when encountering obstacles. This dynamic positioning enables weight transfer to the forward platform, improving stability and rider control during obstacle traversal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If the lateral distance between foot platforms is fixed, then the manufacturing is simpler, but it cannot accommodate different riding preferences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadjustable stance widthVSAvoidconnector structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The connector joining the two foot platforms is made flexible or telescopic, allowing the lateral distance between platforms to be dynamically adjusted. This enables riders to change their stance width according to preference or riding conditions while adding only moderate complexity to the connector structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11279432B2Self-balancing foot platform devices
Publication Date: 2022.03.22 CHEN SHANE
  • US11279432B2 patent drawing
  • US11279432B2 patent drawing
  • US11279432B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A fore-aft self-balancing transportation device, typically in a pair, one for the right foot and the other for the left foot of a rider. The platform is limited in size and positioned with a top surface wholly above the drive wheel, such that the platform straddles the axis of rotation of the drive wheel. The wheel may extend laterally to enhance side-to-side stability. The devices are configured for hands-free control, a device being driven forward or backward in response to the fore-aft tilt angle of a rider's foot on the platform (and hence, the fore-aft tilt angle of that platform). Various embodiments and features are disclosed.