SEM Nanoprinter Module With In-Situ Spin Coating for 10 nm 3D Lithography

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current additive manufacturing technologies are limited to the macroscopic scale and struggle to achieve nanoscopic resolution with a variety of materials like conductors, semiconductors, and insulators, while traditional lithographic techniques are cumbersome and inefficient for 3D nanoscale manufacturing.

Innovation Solution

A 3D nanoprinter electron beam lithography module with an in-situ spin-coating stage integrated into a scanning electron microscope (SEM) system, utilizing liquid phase electron beam-induced deposition (LP-EBID) to achieve high-purity deposition and etching of materials at the nanoscale, enabling rapid prototyping and manufacturing of complex nanostructures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional lithographic techniques are used for 3D nanoscale manufacturing, then material deposition and removal can be achieved layer by layer, but the process becomes cumbersome and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenanoscale resolutionVSAvoidmanufacturing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple functions (spin-coating, liquid dispensing, electron beam lithography, and material deposition) into a single integrated 3D nanoprinter system. This merging eliminates the need for separate lithographic steps and material deposition processes, thereby maintaining nanoscale precision while dramatically improving manufacturing efficiency through automated sequential operations within one chamber.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables continuous manufacturing operations by maintaining vacuum conditions throughout the process and performing spin-coating, lithography, and deposition sequentially without breaking vacuum or removing the sample from the chamber. This continuity eliminates idle time between steps and sustains productive action throughout the entire manufacturing cycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

2Manufacturing precision

If 2-photon polymerization is used to achieve nanometer resolution, then resolution in the hundreds of nanometers can be achieved, but the choice of available materials is limited to photopolymerizable resins

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveresolutionVSAvoidmaterial choice
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The electron beam lithography module serves multiple functions: it can write patterns in various resist materials, deposit different materials (metals, semiconductors, insulators) through liquid phase electron beam-induced deposition, and etch materials. This multi-functionality allows the system to maintain nanometer-scale resolution while being compatible with a wide range of materials beyond photopolymerizable resins, including conductors, semiconductors, and insulators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If gas phase electron or ion beam induced processing is used to add and subtract material, then arbitrary nanoscale patterns can be produced, but material purity is limited to 50 atomic % and processing times are large

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepattern flexibilityVSAvoidmaterial purity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs liquid phase electron beam-induced deposition instead of gas phase processing. Liquid precursors are delivered via capillary action or pressure-driven flow to the sample surface, where electron beam irradiation induces deposition of high-purity materials. This liquid-phase approach enables arbitrary nanoscale patterning while achieving material purity exceeding 90 atomic %, dramatically improving upon the 50 atomic % limitation of gas phase methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

4Ease of manufacture

If ion beam processing is used for material deposition, then material can be added at the nanoscale, but damage is caused to the underlying layers and ion implantation and species intermixing occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial deposition capabilityVSAvoidlayer damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces ion beam processing with electron beam-induced liquid phase deposition. Instead of using high-energy ions that physically damage underlying layers, the system uses low-energy electron beams to trigger chemical reactions in liquid precursor materials deposited on the sample surface. This substitution eliminates mechanical damage, ion implantation, and species intermixing while maintaining the capability for nanoscale material deposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Facilitates the formation of thin layer-by-layer 3D nanostructures with resolutions down to 10 nm, allowing for rapid and precise deposition of conductors, insulators, and semiconductors, while maintaining high material purity and efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

the electron beam interacts with the liquid precursor, precipitating high purity (over 90%) metals and semiconductors through the electrochemical reduction of metallic cations by secondary or solvated electrons

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrochemical reduction: Redox Reactions

Implementation Method 2

an electron or ion beam generator providing an electron and/or ion beam into the chamber and onto the workpiece

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectron beam: Electron Beam

Implementation Method 3

The in-situ spin-coating stage can include a spin-coating motor, a spin-coating sample stub for holding a workpiece (or 'sample' or 'wafer' or 'substrate') and that is driven by the motor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpin coating: Spin Coating

Data Source

PatentUS12174542B23D nanoprinter
Publication Date: 2024.12.24 SIVANANTHAN LABORATORIES INC
  • US12174542B2 patent drawing
  • US12174542B2 patent drawing
  • US12174542B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A 3D nanoprinter electron beam lithography module for a lithography system, such as a scanning electron microscope (SEM) or an environmental SEM (ESEM) with a beam blanker and electron beam lithography attachment, but generally applicable to any electron beam lithography capable system. The module is comprised of an in-situ spin-coating stage that is compatible with a cooling-SEM stage, with a spin-coating motor, a spin-coating sample stub, a liquid waste collector cup, a liquid dispensing arm holding a tube bundle that is connected via tubing to micro-syringe pumps or a pressure driven flow controller or pumps connected to fluid reservoirs, an electron beam scan generator control box, electrical feedthroughs, control electronics, and a computing system responsible for controlling the entire module. The dispensing arm can be controlled by a servo motor.