Scanning Electron Microscope Sliding Vacuum Seal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Scanning electron microscopes face challenges in maintaining high image quality and mechanical stability due to limitations in vacuum sealing and sample positioning, which can lead to contamination and damage from atmospheric pressure exposure.

Innovation Solution

A scanning electron microscope design featuring a sliding vacuum seal with grooved apertures for improved suction force and rigid positioning, along with a movable sample carrier and electron detector system, and a motion control unit using three-dimensional models to avoid collisions within the vacuum chamber.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a sliding vacuum seal is used between the electron optical imaging system and the sample carrier, then the sample carrier can move between loading and imaging positions, but mechanical stability and vacuum sealing may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesample carrier mobilityVSAvoidvacuum sealing reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The vacuum seal is segmented into multiple grooves (first groove in the first plate, second groove in the second plate) that work together to maintain vacuum sealing during movement. This segmentation allows the seal to adapt to different positions while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The sliding vacuum seal acts as an intermediary mechanism between the stationary electron optical imaging system and the movable sample carrier. It mediates the movement while maintaining vacuum isolation, allowing positional change without compromising the vacuum environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Stability of the object's composition

If the first plate and second plate are made rigidly connected for stable imaging, then mechanical stability improves, but the sample carrier cannot be moved for loading and imaging operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical stabilityVSAvoidsample carrier mobility
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The connection between the first and second plates transitions from static to dynamic. The plates are rigid when needed for stability during imaging, but can slide relative to each other when movement is required for loading operations, providing both stability and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The rigid connection is segmented into movable and fixed portions. The grooves in each plate create zones of flexibility that allow movement while maintaining overall structural rigidity for stable imaging when required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If apertures are provided for electron beam passage, then electron optical functionality is enabled, but vacuum sealing is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectron beam transmissionVSAvoidvacuum seal integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The vacuum seal uses groove structures that function as flexible barriers around the apertures. These grooves can deform or adapt to the presence of the aperture openings while maintaining the vacuum seal, allowing electron beam transmission without compromising vacuum integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The grooved vacuum seal structures act as intermediaries around the apertures, mediating between the need for electron beam passage and the requirement for vacuum sealing. The grooves create a sealed path around the apertures that allows beam transmission while maintaining vacuum isolation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Force

If the groove is maintained at a vacuum level between first vacuum level and ambient pressure, then suction force is optimized for plate abutment, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuction forceVSAvoidvacuum system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Different vacuum levels are applied to different regions of the system. The groove is maintained at an intermediate vacuum level (second vacuum level) optimized for suction force, while the electron optical imaging system operates at a higher vacuum level (first vacuum level) optimized for electron beam operation. This local differentiation optimizes each region for its specific function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The vacuum system is segmented into zones with different vacuum levels. The groove forms a separate vacuum zone with its own pressure control, allowing independent optimization of suction force without affecting the main electron optical vacuum environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances image quality by maintaining a stable vacuum environment, prevents contamination, and ensures precise sample positioning and collision-free movement, thereby improving mechanical stability and operational safety.

Implementation Method 1

a vacuum can be applied to the groove, hence, efficiently providing a suction force between the first and second plate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum suction force: Vacuum

Implementation Method 2

The electron beam source provides an electron beam which is focused onto a sample. The impinging electron beam causes secondary electrons to be emitted from the surface of the sample

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectron beam interaction: Electron Beam

Data Source

PatentUS11024481B2Scanning electron microscope
Publication Date: 2021.06.01 PHENOM WORLD HLDG BV
  • US11024481B2 patent drawing
  • US11024481B2 patent drawing
  • US11024481B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A scanning electron microscope. The scanning electron microscope may include a sliding vacuum seal between the electron optical imaging system and the sample carrier with a first plate having a first aperture associated with the electron optical imaging system and resting against a second plate having a second aperture associated with the sample carrier. The first plate and/or the second plate includes a groove circumscribing the first and/or second aperture. The scanning electron microscope may include a detector movable relative to the electron beam. The scanning electron microscope may include a motion control unit for moving a sample carrier along a collision free path.