Autonomous Vehicle Semantic Classification for Dynamic Map Updates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in safely navigating dynamic environments due to outdated data, as they may not recognize changes in pedestrian patterns and road infrastructure, leading to potential collisions.

Innovation Solution

Implementing an autonomous vehicle system with real-time object classification and mapping updates using a fleet of vehicles connected to a service platform, equipped with sensors and communication redundancy to adapt to environmental changes and ensure safe navigation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If autonomous vehicles use outdated map data for navigation, then device complexity is reduced, but safety and navigation accuracy deteriorate due to inability to recognize environmental changes

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoiddata update system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous vehicle system performs self-updating of map data by automatically detecting environmental changes through its sensors and classifiers, eliminating the need for external manual updates or complex centralized update systems. The vehicle classifies objects and behaviors autonomously and updates its own navigation data in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors environmental changes through sensors and feeds this information back to update map data. The classification of objects and pedestrian behaviors provides feedback that triggers incremental map modifications, creating a closed-loop system that maintains safety without requiring complex external update mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If autonomous vehicles implement real-time object classification and mapping updates, then safety and adaptability improve, but device complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental adaptationVSAvoidclassification and update system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic adaptability by continuously adjusting its classification models and map data based on real-time environmental observations. The classification thresholds and map update频率 are dynamically adjusted based on the rate of environmental change and confidence levels of classifications, allowing the system to be highly adaptive when needed and more conservative when conditions are stable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial updates by only modifying map data when actual environmental changes are detected through classification, rather than continuously updating all map data. This selective updating approach reduces computational complexity while maintaining adaptability to genuine environmental changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If autonomous vehicles continuously update map data with environmental changes, then navigation accuracy improves, but loss of time for data processing and potential collisions with pedestrians increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental recognition accuracyVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs partial updates by only processing and updating map data when classification confidence exceeds certain thresholds or when significant environmental changes are detected. This selective processing reduces the time loss associated with continuous full-map updates while maintaining high recognition accuracy for critical changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system skips unnecessary processing steps by using pre-defined classification thresholds and confidence levels to quickly determine whether map updates are needed. When changes are detected, the system rushes through the update process by applying incremental modifications only to affected map regions rather than processing the entire map data set.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

Data Source

PatentUS11301767B2Automated extraction of semantic information to enhance incremental mapping modifications for robotic vehicles
Publication Date: 2022.04.12 ZOOX INC
  • US11301767B2 patent drawing
  • US11301767B2 patent drawing
  • US11301767B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods and apparatus may be configured to implement automatic semantic classification of a detected object(s) disposed in a region of an environment external to an autonomous vehicle. The automatic semantic classification may include analyzing over a time period, patterns in a predicted behavior of the detected object(s) to infer a semantic classification of the detected object(s). Analysis may include processing of sensor data from the autonomous vehicle to generate heat maps indicative of a location of the detected object(s) in the region during the time period. Probabilistic statistical analysis may be applied to the sensor data to determine a confidence level in the inferred semantic classification. The inferred semantic classification may be applied to the detected object(s) when the confidence level exceeds a predetermined threshold value (e.g., greater than 50%).