Sensor-Equipped Training Dummy for Sniper Scenario Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current training targets for snipers, such as metal or cardboard silhouettes and dummies on vehicles, fail to simulate the dynamic and emotionally charged situations required for training in scenarios like hostage situations, sudden decision-making, and the ethical implications of 'final shots', as they lack the realism to replicate the complexity of real-world scenarios effectively.

Innovation Solution

A target dummy equipped with a plurality of sensors that communicate with a sensor data evaluating apparatus to determine the point of entry and trajectory of projectiles, allowing for the classification of hit quality and simulating various scenarios like dropping a weapon or using a hostage, through wireless communication and a gel-filled body for realistic energy transfer and echo suppression.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If dummies are mounted on armored small vehicles and remotely controlled to simulate combat situations, then the realism of simulated combat scenarios is improved, but the ability to simulate dynamic decision-making situations (such as hostage situations, weapon drops, and sudden behavioral changes) deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverealism of simulated combat scenariosVSAvoidability to simulate dynamic decision-making situations
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The dummy is transformed from a static or remotely controlled target into a dynamically autonomous system that can independently detect hits via sensors and change its behavior patterns in real-time. The autonomous control unit processes sensor data and triggers appropriate reactions (aggressive behavior, panic, weapon dropping, hostage protection) based on the hit location and training scenario requirements, enabling the dummy to adapt its behavior dynamically during the simulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The dummy serves itself by autonomously processing sensor data and generating appropriate behavioral responses without requiring remote control intervention. The autonomous control unit continuously monitors sensor inputs and automatically adjusts the dummy's behavior, allowing the system to react independently to training situations and simulate realistic human responses to being hit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If sensors are integrated into the dummy to detect hit quality and trajectory, then the measurement precision of projectile impact is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehit quality and trajectory determinationVSAvoidsensor system and data evaluation apparatus
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor system is designed with multi-functionality to reduce overall complexity. The same sensor array serves multiple purposes: detecting hit location, determining trajectory, measuring impact force, and triggering appropriate behavioral responses. The autonomous control unit processes all this data through a unified evaluation algorithm that correlates sensor signals with pre-programmed training scenarios, eliminating the need for separate specialized systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines the sensor data acquisition, processing, and response generation functions into a single integrated autonomous control unit. This consolidation merges multiple subsystems (sensors, data evaluation apparatus, actuation mechanisms) into one cohesive system that operates autonomously, reducing the overall device complexity while maintaining high measurement precision for hit quality and trajectory determination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the dummy is designed to simulate various human behaviors (dropping weapon, protecting hostage, aggressive reaction), then the adaptability of training scenarios is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining scenario diversityVSAvoidautonomous control and actuation systems
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The dummy's autonomous control unit is pre-programmed with multiple behavioral response patterns and training scenarios before deployment. These pre-configured scenarios include aggressive reactions, panic behaviors, weapon dropping, and hostage protection responses. When sensors detect a hit, the control unit automatically selects and executes the appropriate pre-programmed behavior based on the hit location and scenario parameters, eliminating the need for complex real-time decision-making algorithms during actual training sessions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Different parts of the dummy are equipped with specific sensors and actuators tailored to their functional requirements. For example, the weapon-holding hand has sensors and actuators specifically designed for detecting hits and simulating weapon dropping, while the area around the hostage has specialized sensors for detecting threats and triggering protective behaviors. This localized specialization allows for diverse training scenarios without requiring every part of the dummy to be overly complex.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables realistic simulation of complex shooting scenarios, allowing snipers to practice quick decision-making and ethical considerations by accurately evaluating hit impacts and simulating dynamic situations, including the use of hostages and weapon drops, thereby enhancing training effectiveness.

Implementation Method 1

The plurality of sensors (105, 106) are pressure sensors which detect a pressure pulse within the dummy (101)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure detection:

Implementation Method 2

In between both phase interfaces, a rather tough and elastic foam material is developed by appropriate softening agents as a paste-like lubricating grease or as an undissolved soft soap, as a gel 170

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectKinetic energy absorption:

Data Source

PatentUS10527392B2Target
Publication Date: 2020.01.07 TACTICALTRIM E K
  • US10527392B2 patent drawing
  • US10527392B2 patent drawing
  • US10527392B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The exemplary arrangement relates to a target comprising at least one dummy depicting at least one part of the human body. According to the exemplary arrangement it is provided, that the dummy depicting at least one part of the human body comprises a plurality of sensors, which communicate with a sensor data evaluating apparatus (140) for the registration of the sensors. The sensor data evaluating apparatus determines, by mathematical correlation of points in time (t1, t2, t3) corresponding to points of maximum pressure (Pmax1, Pmax2, Pmax3) from sensor data of the plurality of sensors the point of entry () and preferentially the trajectory of a projectile penetrating the dummy.