Sensor-Triggered Regenerative Braking Activation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current vehicle systems lack the capability to automatically engage full or near-full regenerative braking capacity when a collision is imminent, as they do not have the necessary information to determine such situations and activate the regenerative braking system independently of the brake pedal input.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising sensors to detect vehicle and object positions and movements, coupled with a system controller that calculates collision risk using 1D, 2D, or 3D vector analysis, automatically activates both friction and regenerative braking systems when a predetermined risk or speed threshold is exceeded, allowing for simultaneous engagement of maximum braking capacity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the regenerative braking system is activated independently of brake pedal input, then the braking capacity and safety are improved, but the complexity of the control system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking safetyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary collision risk assessment using sensor data and vector analysis before the driver applies the brake pedal. When a collision is predicted, the regenerative braking system is pre-positioned to activate immediately upon brake pedal input, eliminating activation delay and maximizing braking effectiveness from the moment the driver reacts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors sensor data, brake pedal position, and vehicle dynamics to provide real-time feedback to the controller. This feedback loop enables the controller to assess collision risk dynamically and adjust the regenerative braking activation strategy, ensuring optimal braking performance while maintaining manageable control complexity through automated decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of time

If the system automatically activates regenerative braking based on collision risk calculation, then the response time is improved, but the complexity of detection and measurement increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking response timeVSAvoidcollision risk assessment
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously performs vector analysis and collision risk assessment in advance, using sensor data to predict potential collision scenarios before they materialize. This preliminary preparation ensures that when a collision becomes imminent, the system can immediately activate regenerative braking without requiring time-consuming calculations at the moment of brake application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor system serves multiple functions: detecting object position and movement, calculating collision risk through vector analysis, monitoring brake pedal input, and providing data for both collision avoidance and normal braking operations. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated systems, managing detection complexity while enabling rapid response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Power

If full regenerative braking capacity is engaged simultaneously with friction braking, then the braking power is improved, but the energy management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking powerVSAvoidenergy management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

When collision risk is detected, the system pre-configures the energy management system to allow full regenerative braking capacity activation. This preliminary preparation ensures that when the brake pedal is applied, maximum regenerative braking power can be engaged immediately alongside friction braking without delay, achieving optimal braking power while simplifying real-time energy management decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the vehicle to stop before a collision by utilizing the full or near-full regenerative braking capacity in conjunction with friction braking, enhancing safety by automatically engaging maximum braking capacity when a collision is unavoidable.

Implementation Method 1

the regenerative braking system uses an electric motor as a generator to convert the kinetic energy into electric energy that can be recovered to the power grid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

kinetic energy is lost as heat in friction braking systems

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS10189452B2Sensor-triggering of friction and regenerative braking
Publication Date: 2019.01.29 FARADAY&FUTURE INC
  • US10189452B2 patent drawing
  • US10189452B2 patent drawing
  • US10189452B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an emergency stop situation, the regenerative braking system is used to assist in rapid deceleration, by combining regenerative braking with conventional friction brakes. Sensors can also be used to trigger the braking systems, even before the driver is able to react. These sensors might include external cameras, ABS activation detection, radar and ultrasound.