Server Cabinet Cooling with Distributed Compressors and PCM Storage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cooling systems in data centers face challenges such as high energy consumption, inefficiency, space requirements, complexity, and environmental impact, particularly in high-density computing environments, with liquid cooling systems being costly and air cooling systems becoming inefficient as heat densities increase.

Innovation Solution

An oil-free direct-expansion cooling system with a distributed small compressor, integrated phase change energy storage material, and free cooling control technology, which reduces energy costs by storing cold capacity during low-energy periods and releasing it during high-energy periods, and optimizes airflow management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If liquid cooling systems are used to handle high heat density, then cooling efficiency is improved, but system complexity and initial cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the cooling function into multiple distributed small compressors located at different zones or racks, rather than using a single centralized large compressor. This segmentation reduces the complexity of any single component while collectively handling the high heat density through distributed cooling units

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Phase change material is introduced as an intermediary thermal storage medium between the heat source (servers) and the cooling system. The PCM absorbs excess heat during phase transition, decoupling the immediate cooling demand from the compressor operation, thereby improving overall cooling efficiency while reducing the complexity of continuous active cooling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of energy

If liquid cooling systems are deployed for high-density computing, then cooling performance is improved, but initial cost and maintenance requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling performanceVSAvoidinitial cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses inexpensive phase change material that can be easily replaced or replenished compared to expensive liquid cooling infrastructure. The PCM serves as a cost-effective thermal management solution that doesn't require complex piping, pumps, or specialized maintenance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The phase change material provides passive thermal storage and regulation without requiring active control systems, sensors, or continuous monitoring. The PCM automatically absorbs and releases heat based on temperature conditions, reducing the need for complex control infrastructure and maintenance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If air cooling is used for simplicity, then ease of implementation is improved, but cooling efficiency deteriorates as heat density increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of implementationVSAvoidcooling efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system utilizes phase change material that transitions between solid and liquid states to absorb and release large amounts of latent heat. This phase transition mechanism provides high-density thermal storage in a compact form factor, achieving superior cooling efficiency compared to air cooling while maintaining simpler implementation than liquid cooling systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

4Power

If centralized chiller systems are used, then cooling capacity is sufficient, but reliability decreases due to concentration of failure points

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling capacityVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling system is divided into multiple independent distributed compressors and thermal zones, each capable of operating autonomously. This segmentation eliminates the single point of failure inherent in centralized chillers, as the failure of one distributed unit does not compromise the entire cooling system's reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each distributed cooling unit is optimized for its specific local thermal load and environmental conditions. The local compressors and PCM storage are tailored to the specific heat density and cooling requirements of each rack or zone, improving both reliability and efficiency through localized optimization rather than uniform centralized control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves energy-efficient cooling with reduced space requirements, lower operational costs, and improved reliability by minimizing compressor energy consumption and utilizing thermal storage for peak demand periods.

Implementation Method 1

integrated phase change energy storage material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase change: Phase Change

Implementation Method 2

storing cold capacity during low-energy periods and releasing it during high-energy periods

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal energy storage: Thermal Energy Storage

Implementation Method 3

oil-free direct-expansion cooling system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDirect expansion cooling: Evaporation

Implementation Method 4

evaporator...absorbing heat from the server cabinet air

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat absorption: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 5

condenser...releases heat from the refrigerant

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat rejection: Condensation

Implementation Method 6

throttling device...reduces refrigerant pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure reduction: Pressure Drop

Data Source

PatentUS20260052656A1Method and apparatus for cooling system
Publication Date: 2026.02.19 NEXTAIRE LLC
  • US20260052656A1 patent drawing
  • US20260052656A1 patent drawing
  • US20260052656A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present system provides an improved architecture for cooling server cabinets as well as adapting operations based on dynamic energy costs. The system utilizes a small oil-free compressor, which is distributed on the top of the cabinet, reducing the distance from the evaporator outlet to the compressor suction port, and combines phase change energy storage material and free cooling control technology to achieve further energy-saving effects. The technical scheme adopted by the invention to solve the technical problem is an oil-free direct-expansion cooled communication cabinet, characterized in that it is comprised of an oil-free compressor, with at least one condenser and one evaporator, a throttling device, a gas-liquid separation device, and a communication cabinet. The system stores cold capacity when energy costs are low and releases stored cold capacity when energy costs are high.