Servo Press Slide Position Control via Phase-Switched Loop

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing servo press control methods, such as semi-closed loop and full-closed loop control, face challenges in responding to mechanical alterations like thermal expansion and high-speed driving with low mechanical rigidity, often requiring additional components like linear encoders, which increase costs and restrict attachment options.

Innovation Solution

A servo press system that switches between semi-closed loop and full-closed loop control near the stop position, utilizing an increment-type linear encoder to detect the Z-phase signal, allowing for stable control without additional components like linear encoders, even in systems with low mechanical rigidity and oscillation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If semi-closed loop control is used, then the control system is simple and responsive, but it cannot respond to mechanical alterations such as thermal expansion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse to mechanical alterationsVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically switches between semi-closed loop control and full-closed loop control based on the operational phase. During approach and contact phases, semi-closed loop control is used for simplicity and responsiveness. During positioning phases where thermal expansion affects accuracy, full-closed loop control is activated to compensate for mechanical alterations, thus adapting the system characteristics to match operational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If full-closed loop control is used, then positioning accuracy is improved, but oscillation occurs when mechanical rigidity is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning accuracyVSAvoidsystem stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the control mode based on mechanical rigidity conditions. When mechanical rigidity is low, the system uses semi-closed loop control to avoid oscillation. When rigidity is sufficient and positioning accuracy is critical, full-closed loop control is employed. This dynamic adaptation prevents instability while maintaining precision where feasible.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control process is segmented into different phases (approach, contact, positioning). Full-closed loop control is applied only during specific positioning phases where high accuracy is needed and mechanical conditions are favorable, while semi-closed loop control handles other phases. This segmentation allows precision improvement without incurring oscillation problems throughout the entire operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Manufacturing precision

If a scale is provided over the entire driving range to enable high-speed driving with full-closed loop control, then positioning accuracy is maintained, but the scale becomes long and attachment is restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning accuracyVSAvoidscale attachment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The full-closed loop control with scale is applied only to specific positioning phases rather than the entire driving range. The scale is installed only where needed for high-precision positioning, not throughout the complete travel distance. This segmented application reduces the required scale length and simplifies attachment while maintaining positioning accuracy during critical operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of providing full-closed loop control with scale over the entire driving range, the system applies it partially only where necessary for high-precision positioning. This partial action approach achieves the required manufacturing precision without the excessive complexity and attachment restrictions of a complete-scale solution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10391729B2Servo press, control method, and program
Publication Date: 2019.08.27 JANOME CORP
  • US10391729B2 patent drawing
  • US10391729B2 patent drawing
  • US10391729B2 patent drawing

AI summary

There is provided a servo press capable of performing press working with high accuracy without an increased cost, for example, without any additional special component such as a linear encoder or the like even in a system in which deviation occurs due to disturbances, as well as a control method and a program disturbance. A sensing element is disposed at a stop position of a slide. A servomotor control unit performs: semi-closed loop control based on information detected by a first slide position detection unit disposed at a servomotor, before a signal detection unit detects a signal from the sensing element, and full-closed loop control based on information detected by a second slide position detection unit, after the signal detection unit detects the signal from the sensing element.