Shaped Beam Lithography Shot Segmentation for Pattern Precision

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing methods for forming complex patterns on reticles and substrates using charged particle beam lithography are time-consuming and costly due to the need for multiple shots and complex OPC features, which increase the total feature count and computational labor in optical lithography.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize a plurality of circular or nearly-circular shaped beam shots in a shaped beam charged particle beam writer system to form non-circular patterns on surfaces, allowing for the creation of continuous tracks using a series of curvilinear character projection shots, reducing the number of shots required and improving efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If multiple shots and complex OPC features are used to form complex patterns on reticles and substrates using charged particle beam lithography, then the pattern formation precision is improved, but the time and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepattern formation precisionVSAvoidtime and cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The complex pattern formation process is segmented into multiple passes, where the first pass writes non-critical patterns and the second pass writes critical patterns. This segmentation allows optimization of each pass independently, reducing the total number of shots required while maintaining pattern formation precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first pass performs preliminary writing of non-critical patterns before the second pass writes the critical patterns. This preliminary action prepares the substrate in advance, allowing the second pass to focus only on the most important features, thereby reducing overall processing time and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If the number of shots is reduced to decrease time and cost, then productivity is improved, but the complexity of forming accurate curvilinear patterns increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of pattern formationVSAvoidcomplexity of pattern formation process
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The method extracts and separates the writing of critical and non-critical patterns into different passes. By taking out the non-critical pattern writing in the first pass, the second pass can focus exclusively on critical patterns with fewer shots, reducing overall complexity while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the writing strategy by identifying and prioritizing critical patterns for the second pass while handling non-critical patterns in the first pass. This dynamic approach optimizes the balance between productivity and pattern formation complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If conventional optical lithography with multiple OPC features is used, then pattern accuracy is maintained, but the total feature count and computational labor increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepattern accuracyVSAvoidtotal feature count
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The lithography process is segmented into two passes, with each pass handling specific patterns based on their criticality. This segmentation reduces the total feature count that needs to be processed through complex OPC, while maintaining pattern accuracy through targeted writing in the second pass.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Non-critical patterns are written in advance in the first pass, performing a preliminary action that removes them from the set of patterns requiring complex OPC processing in the second pass. This reduces computational labor and total feature count while maintaining the accuracy of critical patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces the time and cost associated with forming complex patterns by minimizing the number of shots needed, enhancing the speed and accuracy of pattern formation on reticles and substrates while maintaining the required precision and complexity of curvilinear patterns.

Implementation Method 1

a precise electron beam is shaped and steered so as to expose a resist-coated surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCharged particle beam: Electron Beam

Implementation Method 2

ion-implantation (doping)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon implantation: Ion Implantation

Data Source

PatentUS8916315B2Method for fracturing and forming a pattern using shaped beam charged particle beam lithography
Publication Date: 2014.12.23 D2S INC
  • US8916315B2 patent drawing
  • US8916315B2 patent drawing
  • US8916315B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In the field of semiconductor production using shaped charged particle beam lithography, a method and system for fracturing or mask data preparation or proximity effect correction is disclosed, wherein a plurality of circular or nearly-circular shaped beam shots can form a non-circular pattern on a surface. Methods for manufacturing a reticle and for manufacturing a substrate such as a silicon wafer by forming non-circular patterns on a surface using a plurality of circular or nearly-circular shaped beam shots is also disclosed.