Shoulder Departure Assistance System for Overtaking Safety

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Drivers may unintentionally leave their lane to facilitate overtaking, especially in situations where the shoulder or emergency lane ends suddenly or contains obstacles, and may be unaware of approaching vehicles due to distractions or poor conditions, leading to stressful and potentially dangerous situations.

Innovation Solution

A system that detects lane assignment, road property changes, and adjacent vehicles using sensors and map data, providing advance warnings to the driver to safely return to the original lane, reducing false alarms through driver state estimation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the driver leaves the lane to facilitate overtaking, then the overtaking vehicle can pass, but the driver becomes unaware of upcoming threats in the shoulder lane due to distraction or poor conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveovertaking facilitationVSAvoiddriver awareness of threats
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary monitoring mechanism that independently observes the shoulder lane environment and driver state, transferring this information to the driver through warnings. This mediator compensates for the driver's reduced awareness during overtaking maneuvers without interfering with the overtaking process itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops that monitor both the external environment (shoulder lane threats, road property changes) and internal driver state (attention level, drowsiness). This feedback enables real-time detection of dangerous conditions and triggers appropriate warnings to restore driver awareness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the driver steers back into the lane quickly to avoid threats, then safety is improved, but the decision time is reduced due to late detection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety during lane re-entryVSAvoiddriver decision time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary monitoring and detection of threats in the shoulder lane before the driver would naturally become aware of them. By detecting road property changes, obstacles, and adjacent vehicles in advance, the system provides early warnings that give the driver sufficient time to plan and execute safe lane re-entry maneuvers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If the system provides continuous monitoring and warnings, then driver safety is improved, but the device complexity increases due to multiple sensors and processing units

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver safetyVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs multi-functional sensors and processing units that serve multiple purposes: monitoring the shoulder lane environment, detecting driver state, identifying road property changes, and tracking adjacent vehicles. This universal approach reduces the total number of specialized components needed while maintaining comprehensive monitoring capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system combines multiple monitoring functions (environmental sensing, driver state estimation, threat detection) into an integrated warning system. By merging these functions into a unified architecture with shared processing resources and coordinated output mechanisms, the system reduces overall complexity compared to having separate independent systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Reliability

If the system warns the driver of all potential threats, then safety is improved, but false alarms increase causing driver stress

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat detection accuracyVSAvoiddriver stress from false alarms
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from driver state monitoring to dynamically adjust warning thresholds and behavior. By continuously assessing whether the driver is already attentive or distracted, the system can suppress warnings when the driver is actively monitoring the situation, thereby reducing false alarms and driver stress while maintaining safety when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP2279889B1Method and system for shoulder departure assistance in an automotive vehicle
Publication Date: 2015.09.09 VOLVO CAR CORP
  • EP2279889B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2279889B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2279889B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method and system (1) for shoulder departure assistance in an automotive vehicle (2). The system (1) comprises: means (7) for establishing lane assignment (3) when travelling fully or partially in a shoulder; means (7) for establishing the presence of upcoming changes in road properties of the assigned shoulder lane (3); means (9) for establishing the presence of a vehicle (4) in a lane (6) adjacent to the shoulder lane (3) assigned the vehicle (2) hosting the system (1). The system (1) further comprises means (10) for executing a first driver warning - if established that upcoming changes in road properties are such that the assigned shoulder lane (3) is unsuitable for further travel; and means (10) for executing a second driver warning - if further established that a vehicle (4) is present in a lane (6) adjacent to the shoulder lane (3) assigned the vehicle (2) hosting the system (1).