SiC Composite Slurry for Reduced PIP Cycles

Solution Overview

Problem

The sinterability of SiC ceramics is limited by their covalent bonding character, requiring high temperatures and pressures for densification, which can damage mechanical properties and is costly due to the need for multiple precursor impregnation pyrolysis (PIP) cycles, and existing methods struggle to achieve high concentration of SiC composites with improved hardness and thermal stability.

Innovation Solution

A slurry composition with at least 58 vol% SiC filler, including fine and coarse particles in a specific ratio, and a dispersant, is used to create a SiC/SiC composite with a high relative density and hardness, reducing the number of PIP cycles through improved dispersion and densification processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If high concentration of SiC filler is used in slurry, then the number of PIP cycles can be reduced, but the slurry becomes difficult to disperse and process

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the particle size distribution parameter of SiC filler, using a bimodal distribution with fine particles (D50: 1-10 μm) and coarse particles (D50: 20-100 μm) in specific ratios. This parameter optimization allows achieving at least 58 vol% filler concentration while maintaining slurry processability and reducing PIP cycles to 4 or fewer

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite filler system combining SiC particles of different sizes and optionally different shapes (spherical, irregular). This composite approach enables high concentration slurry (≥58 vol%) with improved packing efficiency and maintained dispersibility, resolving the contradiction between concentration and processability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If sintering additives are added to improve sinterability, then densification can be achieved, but second phases form in the matrix or at grain boundaries causing damage to high-temperature mechanical properties

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates sintering additives from the formulation, achieving densification through alternative means: optimized particle size distribution, high initial filler concentration (≥58 vol%), and controlled PIP processing. This removes the harmful second phases while maintaining sinterability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the processing parameters including pyrolysis temperature (1000-1500°C), number of PIP cycles (4 or fewer), and green body density (≥60% relative density), enabling densification without sintering additives and preserving high-temperature mechanical properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If high sintering temperature and pressure are applied to improve densification, then sinterability increases, but the high-temperature mechanical properties are damaged

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary densification during the PIP process by achieving at least 60% relative density in the green body before pyrolysis. This preliminary action reduces the need for subsequent high-temperature/pressure sintering, preserving mechanical properties while achieving adequate densification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the particle size distribution parameters (fine particles D50: 1-10 μm, coarse particles D50: 20-100 μm, ratio 1:1 to 4:1) and filler concentration (≥58 vol%), enabling efficient packing and densification at lower temperatures and pressures, thus avoiding damage to high-temperature mechanical properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method achieves high-density SiC composites with improved hardness and thermal stability while significantly reducing the number of PIP cycles, making the manufacturing process more efficient and cost-effective.

Implementation Method 1

a dispersant, wherein the SiC filler consists of only fine particles having a D50 diameter of 200 nm or less or consists of the fine particles and coarse particles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDispersion: Dispersion (of waves)

Implementation Method 2

the SiC filler consists of only fine particles having a D50 diameter of 200 nm or less or consists of the fine particles and coarse particles having a D50 diameter of 3 μm or more in a ratio of 2:1 to 4.5:1

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectParticle size distribution:

Implementation Method 3

a method for economically and efficiently manufacturing high density SiC composites by significantly reducing the number of PIP cycles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPyrolysis: Pyrolysis

Data Source

PatentUS11524924B2SiC composite and method for manufacturing the same
Publication Date: 2022.12.13
  • US11524924B2 patent drawing
  • US11524924B2 patent drawing
  • US11524924B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a SiC composite and a method for manufacturing the same. More particularly, the present invention relates to a slurry composition for ceramic matrix composites which can not only reduce the number of precursor impregnation pyrolysis (PIP) cycles but also be useful in the PIP process to increase hardness, thermal stability, and relative density.