SiC Flame Detectors Discriminate Premixed and Diffusion Flames

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current flame detection systems in gas turbines cannot discriminate between different types of flames, leading to potential damage and catastrophic malfunctions during flame holding or flashback events in combustors.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of optical flame detection using SiC solid-state flame detectors that differentiate between premixed and diffusion flames by detecting specific ultraviolet and thermal emissions, allowing for precise identification and action to prevent damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If ion-sensing detectors or thermocouples are used to detect flame presence, then flame detection capability is provided, but the system cannot discriminate between different flame types (premixed vs diffusion)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflame type discrimination capabilityVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detection system is segmented into multiple independent optical detectors, each sensitive to different wavelength ranges. One detector monitors ultraviolet emissions (indicative of premixed flame), while another monitors visible/thermal emissions (indicative of diffusion flame). This segmentation allows simultaneous detection of different flame types without requiring a single complex multi-functional detector.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from single-parameter detection (simple flame presence) to multi-dimensional detection by adding wavelength discrimination capability. By measuring emissions across different spectral dimensions (ultraviolet vs visible ranges), the system achieves flame type discrimination while maintaining relatively simple individual detector designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If flame holding or flashback occurs in the premixing zone, then combustion efficiency may be maintained, but serious damage occurs to the combustor and system malfunction ensues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustor operational reliabilityVSAvoiddamage to combustor
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The optical detection system performs preliminary monitoring of flame characteristics before damage occurs. By continuously detecting the spectral emissions from the combustion zone, the system can identify the onset of flashback or flame holding conditions and trigger protective actions (such as shutting down fuel flow) before serious damage to the combustor occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system establishes a feedback loop where optical detectors continuously monitor flame type, the control system compares detected emissions against expected patterns, and corrective actions are automatically implemented when abnormal conditions are detected. This closed-loop feedback enables real-time protection against combustor damage from flashback events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of time

If simple flame detection is used, then device complexity is minimized, but the system cannot provide timely discrimination to prevent damage during flashback events

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse time for flame type discriminationVSAvoidoptical detection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The optical detection system operates continuously, with detectors constantly monitoring combustion zone emissions. This continuous monitoring eliminates detection delays and enables immediate identification of flame type changes. The system maintains uninterrupted observation of combustion characteristics, allowing rapid response to flashback conditions without requiring complex sequential sensing operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution effectively discriminates between flame types, enabling timely intervention to prevent damage to the gas turbine by reducing or eliminating fuel flow during flashback events, thus maintaining optimal operating conditions and reducing emissions.

Implementation Method 1

The SiC solid state flame detector has a responsivity envelope that includes emission sensitivity to wavelengths between about 200 nm and 430 nm. The most intense emission at about 300 nm is produced by the excited OH molecule which is a direct product of the combustion process.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUltraviolet emission detection: Photoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

The SiC photodiodes responsivity characteristics it is not very sensitive to combustor hot wall blackbody radiation or 350 to 450 nm radiation from soot.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal radiation detection: Thermal Radiation

Data Source

PatentUS8752362B2Optical flame holding and flashback detection
Publication Date: 2014.06.17 GE INFRASTRUCTURE TECH LLC
  • US8752362B2 patent drawing
  • US8752362B2 patent drawing
  • US8752362B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Optical flame holding and flashback detection systems and methods are provided. Exemplary embodiments include a combustor including a combustor housing defining a combustion chamber having combustion zones, flame detectors disposed on the combustor housing and in optical communication with the combustion chamber, wherein each of the flame detectors is configured to detect an optical property related to one or more of the combustion zones.