SiC Microreactor Liquid-Phase Fluorination for HCFC-133a

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing processes for manufacturing HCFC-133a and trifluoroethylamine are energy-intensive and environmentally unfriendly, primarily due to their reliance on gas-phase reactions, which consume high amounts of energy and generate significant environmental impact.

Innovation Solution

The process employs microreactors for liquid-phase reactions using trichloroethylene as a starting material, combined with phase separation methods, to efficiently produce HCFC-133a and trifluoroethylamine, reducing energy consumption and environmental impact while eliminating the need for distillation steps.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If gas-phase reactions are used for manufacturing HCFC-133a, then the chemical reaction can proceed effectively, but energy consumption is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction effectivenessVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical state parameter of the reaction system from gas phase to liquid phase. By conducting the fluorination reaction in liquid phase with HF as both reagent and solvent, the process achieves effective chemical conversion while significantly reducing energy consumption associated with gas heating and handling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs liquid-phase chemistry where HF serves as both reagent and solvent medium. This hydraulic approach replaces the pneumatic gas-phase system, enabling reactions to proceed at lower temperatures with better heat transfer efficiency and reduced energy input

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

2Reliability

If gas-phase reactions are used for manufacturing HCFC-133a, then the chemical conversion can be achieved, but environmental impact increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechemical conversionVSAvoidenvironmental impact
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

By changing from gas-phase to liquid-phase reaction conditions, the process reduces volatile emissions and atmospheric pollution. The liquid HF system confines reactants and products more effectively, minimizing harmful environmental releases while maintaining conversion efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The liquid HF environment acts as a controlled, non-volatile reaction medium that prevents unwanted atmospheric interactions. This inert liquid environment contains the reaction species, reducing harmful emissions compared to open gas-phase systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

3Productivity

If conventional batch or continuous reactors are used, then production can be performed, but energy consumption is high due to lack of efficient heat transfer

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction capabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a microstructured reactor design that segments the reaction volume into numerous small channels. This segmentation dramatically increases the surface-area-to-volume ratio, enabling efficient heat transfer and allowing continuous production with minimal energy input for temperature maintenance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The microstructured reactor introduces a new dimensional scale (micro-scale channels) that transforms the heat transfer geometry. This dimensional change enables simultaneous high productivity through continuous flow while maintaining low energy consumption via enhanced surface-area-to-volume heat exchange

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Manufacturing precision

If distillation steps are used for purification, then product purity can be achieved, but process complexity and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct purityVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes phase separation in the liquid phase to purify the product. By exploiting density differences and immiscibility between the organic product layer and aqueous HF layer, high-purity HCFC-133a is obtained through simple decantation or phase separation, eliminating the need for energy-intensive distillation equipment and complex purification trains

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in a more energy-efficient, environmentally friendly, and economically viable method for producing HCFC-133a and trifluoroethylamine, with improved safety and industrial feasibility, as it utilizes microreactors to minimize energy usage and simplify purification through phase separation.

Implementation Method 1

The process employs microreactors for liquid-phase reactions using trichloroethylene as a starting material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLiquid-phase reaction:

Implementation Method 2

combined with phase separation methods, to efficiently produce HCFC-133a and trifluoroethylamine, reducing energy consumption and environmental impact while eliminating the need for distillation steps

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase separation:

Data Source

PatentEP3650437B1Process for the manufacture of 1,1,1-trifluoro-2-chloroethane (HCFC-133a) and/or trifluoroethylamine (TFEA)
Publication Date: 2022.06.01 FUJIAN YONGJING TECH CO LTD
  • EP3650437B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3650437B1 patent drawing
  • EP3650437B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention pertains to a method in which the production of HCFC-133a (1,1,1-trifluoro-2-chloroethane (HCFC-133a) and/or of trifluoroethylamine (TFEA), wherein at least one reaction step takes place in a microreactor. Particularly, in preferred embodiments of the invention pertains to a method in which the production of ofHCFC-133a (1,1,1-trifluoro-2-chloroethane (HCFC-133a) and/or of trifluoroethylamine (TFEA) wherein at least one reaction step takes place in a microreactor that is comprising or is made of SiC ("SiC-microreactor"), or in a microreactor that is comprising or is made of an alloy, e.g. such as Hastelloy C.In an ebodiment, the processes for the manufacture of ofHCFC-133a (1,1,1-trifluoro-2-chloroethane (HCFC-133a) and/or of trifluoroethylamine (TFEA) can be efficiently combined in that HCFC-133a (1,1,1-trifluoro-2-chloroethane (HCFC-133a) produced by the method according the invention by using a microreactor, preferably an SiC-microreactor, may preferably advantageously serve as starting material/and/or intermediate material in the manufacture of trifluoroethylamine (TFEA), preferably also in a microreactor. In the said manufactures of HCFC-133a and/or for the manufacture of TFEA the HCFC-133a and/or the TEFA can be easily, e.g. by a method with only low energy consumption, purified and/or isolated, and preferably the process for purifying and/or isolating does not require a distillation. Advantageously, the separation from excess HF and from the catalyst can easily take place in an energy-saving manner by phase separation.