SILCS FragMaps for Binding Site Identification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current computational methods for fragment-based drug discovery are limited by high costs and inefficiencies in experimental biophysical techniques like NMR spectroscopy and x-ray crystallography, and they fail to accurately account for protein conformational heterogeneity and solvation effects, making it difficult to identify optimal binding sites for small molecules.

Innovation Solution

The method of Site Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation (SILCS) uses all-atom explicit-solvent molecular dynamics simulations to generate 3D probability maps (FragMaps) that reveal strong binding sites for hydrophobic, aromatic, hydrogen bond donor, and hydrogen bond acceptor molecules on large molecules, incorporating protein flexibility and solvation effects, thereby guiding the design of inhibitor ligands and optimizing lead compounds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If NMR spectroscopy and x-ray crystallography are used to detect fragment binding, then binding site identification accuracy is improved, but time consumption and material costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebinding site identification accuracyVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates computational copies (in silico models) of the biophysical detection processes. Instead of performing actual NMR or x-ray experiments, the invention uses computational simulations that replicate the binding detection capability, thereby eliminating the time and material costs while preserving the binding site identification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical and experimental systems (NMR spectrometers, x-ray crystallography equipment, physical sample preparation) with computational algorithms and simulations. This substitution maintains the analytical capability to identify binding sites while removing the associated time consumption and material requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If NMR spectroscopy and x-ray crystallography are used to detect fragment binding, then binding site identification accuracy is improved, but material costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebinding site identification accuracyVSAvoidmaterial costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates computational copies (in silico models) of the biophysical detection processes. Instead of performing actual NMR or x-ray experiments, the invention uses computational simulations that replicate the binding detection capability, thereby eliminating the time and material costs while preserving the binding site identification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical and experimental systems (NMR spectrometers, x-ray crystallography equipment, physical sample preparation) with computational algorithms and simulations. This substitution maintains the analytical capability to identify binding sites while removing the associated time consumption and material requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If computational methods assume rigid large molecules, then computational efficiency is improved, but accuracy in accounting for conformational heterogeneity and solvation effects deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoidaccuracy of binding site identification
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from static rigid molecular models to dynamic flexible models that account for conformational heterogeneity. The computational method now simulates the dynamic behavior of large molecules, allowing them to adopt multiple conformations during binding events, thereby improving accuracy while maintaining computational feasibility through efficient sampling methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes key simulation parameters to include explicit solvent molecules and flexible molecular structures. By adjusting the level of detail in the computational model (from rigid to flexible, from implicit to explicit solvent), the method achieves more accurate binding site identification while managing computational costs through optimized simulation protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

SILCS significantly reduces the time, labor, and materials required compared to conventional methods, providing accurate and efficient identification of binding sites and optimization of lead compounds, enabling high-throughput in silico screening with improved accuracy and reduced costs.

Implementation Method 1

The method includes performing molecular dynamics simulations of a system comprising the large molecule and multiple small molecules in an aqueous solution

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMolecular dynamics simulation:

Implementation Method 2

introducing a repulsive interaction energy between the small nonpolar molecules to prevent nonpolar aggregation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrophobic effect: Hydrophobe

Implementation Method 3

all-atom explicit-solvent molecular dynamics simulations to generate 3D probability maps (FragMaps) that reveal strong binding sites

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolvation: Solvation

Data Source

PatentUS10002228B2Method for binding site identification by molecular dynamics simulation (silcs: site identification by ligand competitive saturation)
Publication Date: 2018.06.19 UNIV OF MARYLAND
  • US10002228B2 patent drawing
  • US10002228B2 patent drawing
  • US10002228B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention describes an explicit solvent all-atom molecular dynamics methodology (SILCS: Site Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation) that uses small aliphatic and aromatic molecules plus water molecules to map the affinity pattern of a large molecule for hydrophobic groups, aromatic groups, hydrogen bond donors, and hydrogen bond acceptors. By simultaneously incorporating ligands representative of all these functionalities, the method is an in silico free energy-based competition assay that generates three-dimensional probability maps of fragment binding (FragMaps) indicating favorable fragment:large molecule interactions. The FragMaps may be used to qualitatively inform the design of small-molecule ligands or as scoring grids for high-throughput in silico docking that incorporates both an atomic-level description of solvation and the large molecule's flexibility.