Single-Balanced Mixer Architecture With Dummy Load Noise Rejection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mixer architectures, such as single-balanced and double-balanced mixers, face limitations in noise rejection and power consumption, with double-balanced mixers requiring fully differential LNAs that consume more power and occupy more area, while single-balanced mixers have poor noise rejection properties.

Innovation Solution

A mixer design that incorporates a single-ended LNA coupled with a single-balanced portion and a dummy portion, utilizing a dummy load to match the impedance and improve noise rejection, allowing for area savings without compromising noise performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a double-balanced mixer is used, then noise rejection properties are improved, but power consumption and die area increase due to requiring a fully differential LNA

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise rejection propertiesVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The mixer is divided into two separate single-balanced mixers instead of using one double-balanced mixer. Each single-balanced mixer handles one phase of the differential signal, allowing the use of a single-ended LNA while achieving noise rejection comparable to a double-balanced mixer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Two single-balanced mixers are combined in a differential configuration to achieve the noise rejection performance of a double-balanced mixer. The outputs of both mixers are combined to produce the final differential output signal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If a double-balanced mixer is used, then noise rejection properties are improved, but die area increases due to requiring a fully differential LNA

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise rejection propertiesVSAvoiddie area
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The mixer is divided into two separate single-balanced mixers instead of using one double-balanced mixer. Each single-balanced mixer handles one phase of the differential signal, allowing the use of a single-ended LNA while achieving noise rejection comparable to a double-balanced mixer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A dummy load is introduced as a copy of the actual load to create a balanced input environment for the single-ended LNA. This dummy load mirrors the electrical characteristics of the real load, enabling proper differential operation without requiring a fully differential LNA.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If a balun is added to transform single-ended LNA output to fully differential signal, then noise rejection is improved, but die area increases and insertion loss occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise rejection propertiesVSAvoiddie area
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The balun component is removed from the signal path entirely. Instead of adding a balun to transform single-ended to differential signals, the circuit is designed to natively support single-ended operation with a dummy load, eliminating the need for the balun and its associated die area and insertion loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The dummy load serves as an intermediary element that creates a balanced input environment without requiring active transformation components like baluns. It provides the necessary electrical balance through passive impedance matching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Area of stationary object

If a single-balanced mixer is used, then area is reduced, but noise rejection properties deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedie areaVSAvoidnoise rejection properties
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Two single-balanced mixers are combined in a differential configuration to achieve the noise rejection performance of a double-balanced mixer. The outputs of both mixers are combined to produce the final differential output signal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The mixer is divided into two separate single-balanced mixers instead of using one double-balanced mixer. Each single-balanced mixer handles one phase of the differential signal, allowing the use of a single-ended LNA while achieving noise rejection comparable to a double-balanced mixer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3116121B1Mixer architectures
Publication Date: 2020.08.05 QUALCOMM INC
  • EP3116121B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3116121B1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP3116121B1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

Techniques for designing a single-balanced mixer coupled to a dummy portion with a dummy load to improve noise rejection. In an aspect, a single-ended signal (RF) from a stage preceding the mixer, e.g., a low-noise amplifier (LNA), is coupled to the input of the single-balanced mixer to be mixed with a local oscillator (LO) signal. A dummy portion replicating the topology of the single-balanced mixer is coupled to the single-balanced mixer to improve noise rejection, with the LO signal also provided to the dummy portion. The input of the dummy portion may be coupled, e.g., to a dummy load, which is designed to replicate the loading characteristics of the preceding stage, e.g., the LNA.