Slew-Rate Compensated Transistor Turnoff for Voltage Spike Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

High-voltage transistors face damage due to rapid increases in drain or collector voltage during deactivation, particularly in short-circuit or desaturation events, as existing systems fail to account for inherent delays in transistor control circuits and comparators, leading to unpredictable voltage errors.

Innovation Solution

A slew-rate compensated transistor turnoff system that includes a slew-rate compensator generating a voltage proportional to the slew-rate of the control voltage, which is added to a reference voltage to provide an adjusted reference for the comparator, ensuring timely deactivation and mitigating voltage errors by compensating for delays in the comparator and transistor control circuit.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If the transistor is deactivated rapidly, then the switching speed is improved, but the drain or collector voltage increases rapidly causing damage to the transistor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching speedVSAvoidrapid voltage increase
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by detecting the plateau voltage level before complete transistor turnoff and using this information to control the deactivation process. The slew-rate compensator proactively adjusts the control voltage waveform to ensure the transistor reaches the plateau voltage at the correct moment, preventing harmful voltage spikes before they occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies dynamics by making the deactivation rate variable rather than fixed. The slew-rate compensator dynamically adjusts the control voltage waveform based on real-time feedback from the comparator, changing the slew-rate during the turnoff process to maintain the transistor voltage at the plateau level and prevent damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Object-affected harmful factors

If a programmable slew-rate is used to achieve gradual deactivation, then the transistor damage is mitigated, but the system complexity increases due to additional control circuits

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransistor damageVSAvoidcontrol circuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback by continuously monitoring the control voltage with a comparator and comparing it against a reference voltage. The comparator output feeds back to the slew-rate compensator, which adjusts the control voltage waveform in real-time to maintain accurate plateau voltage detection, enabling precise control without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The slew-rate compensator acts as an intermediary between the simple comparator circuit and the transistor control. It translates the comparator's binary output into a controlled slew-rate adjustment, mediating between simple detection and complex waveform generation to reduce overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If the deactivation stops in response to the control voltage falling below a reference voltage, then the deactivation timing is simplified, but voltage errors occur due to inherent delays in the comparator and control circuit

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeactivation control simplicityVSAvoidvoltage detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies preliminary anti-action by using the slew-rate compensator to anticipate and counteract the inherent delays in the comparator and control circuit. The compensator pre-adjusts the control voltage waveform to compensate for the expected delay, ensuring accurate plateau voltage detection despite the simplified control architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS11283448B2Slew-rate compensated transistor turnoff system
Publication Date: 2022.03.22 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
  • US11283448B2 patent drawing
  • US11283448B2 patent drawing
  • US11283448B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One example includes a circuit that includes a transistor control circuit having an input and an output adapted to be coupled to the output of the transistor control circuit and can provide a slew-rate compensation voltage proportional to a slew-rate of a control voltage of the transistor. A reference voltage source can be coupled to the slew-rate compensator to provide a reference voltage at the output of the reference voltage source, the slew-rate compensator configured to add the slew-rate compensation voltage to the reference voltage to provide an adjusted reference voltage at the output of the slew rate compensator. A reference comparator having a first input, a second input and an output is coupled to the input of the transistor control circuit. The first input can be coupled to the control terminal of the transistor, and the second input can be coupled to the output of the slew-rate compensator.