Sodium Carbonate Crystallization via Methanol Precipitation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for producing sodium carbonate crystals from trona deposits face challenges in achieving desired size, shape, and density distributions, leading to inefficiencies and impurity issues, particularly with calcium and magnesium compounds, and require energy-intensive processes.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the removal of calcium and magnesium compounds from the input solution, followed by methanol addition to precipitate carbonate, washing with a methanol-containing solution, and low-temperature drying, which allows for the production of sodium carbonate crystals with controlled size, shape, and density, while reducing impurities and improving energy efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional processes (monohydrate or sesquicarbonate) are used to produce sodium carbonate crystals, then production can be achieved, but the crystals have uncontrolled size distribution and high impurity levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrystal size distribution controlVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by controlling supersaturation level, temperature, and agitation rate during crystallization to achieve uniform crystal size distribution. The process maintains specific supersaturation ranges (0.01-0.1 mol/L) and temperature profiles (30-80°C) to control nucleation and growth rates, producing crystals with standardized sizes of 0.5-2.0 mm diameter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs preliminary action through seed crystal addition before main crystallization. Seeds are prepared in advance with controlled size distribution, and their addition initiates controlled crystal growth, preventing uncontrolled nucleation and ensuring uniform final crystal size. This preliminary seeding step is critical for achieving the desired manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional crystallization processes are used, then sodium carbonate can be produced, but impurity removal efficiency is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpurity levelsVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies extraction by removing calcium and magnesium impurities through selective precipitation before crystallization. Calcium is removed by adding carbonate to form calcium carbonate precipitate, and magnesium is removed by adding hydroxide to form magnesium hydroxide precipitate. These impurities are then separated by filtration, achieving impurity levels below 10 ppm without significantly reducing production efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the purification process into distinct stages: (1) calcium removal by carbonate precipitation, (2) magnesium removal by hydroxide precipitation, (3) filtration to separate precipitates, and (4) controlled crystallization of pure sodium carbonate. This segmentation allows each purification step to target specific impurities efficiently, achieving high purity products while maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Object-affected harmful factors

If high-temperature calcining is used in conventional processes, then organic impurities are destroyed, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorganic impurity removalVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by removing organic impurities through oxidation with hydrogen peroxide or ozone before crystallization. This preliminary removal eliminates the need for high-temperature calcining (above 200°C) that would be required to destroy organics in conventional processes. The oxidation step occurs at ambient or mildly elevated temperatures, dramatically reducing energy consumption while achieving complete organic impurity removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the thermal-mechanical calcining process (requiring high temperatures and extended residence times) with a chemical oxidation process using hydrogen peroxide or ozone. This substitution achieves organic impurity destruction through chemical reaction rather than thermal decomposition, reducing energy consumption by eliminating the need for high-temperature heating and long residence times in rotary kilns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Manufacturing precision

If multiple evaporation stages are used in sesquicarbonate process, then crystal purity improves, but energy consumption and process time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrystal purityVSAvoidprocess time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies extraction by removing soluble inorganic impurities through selective precipitation before crystallization. Calcium is precipitated as carbonate, magnesium as hydroxide, and other impurities are removed through controlled chemical reactions. This preliminary extraction of impurities eliminates the need for multiple evaporation stages, achieving high crystal purity in a single crystallization step and reducing process time from days to hours.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in sodium carbonate crystals with reduced impurity levels and improved size and density control, enhancing the overall efficiency and heat balance of the process, allowing for the production of tailored crystal products with lower energy consumption.

Implementation Method 1

adding methanol of 30% to 70% by volume to the solution in the precipitator so as to precipitate carbonate from the solution

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPrecipitation: Precipitation

Implementation Method 2

drying the washed precipitated crystals at low temperatures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Data Source

PatentUS7655053B1Process for sodium carbonate crystals from solutions
Publication Date: 2010.02.02 BOWMAN RONALD W
  • US7655053B1 patent drawing
  • US7655053B1 patent drawing
  • US7655053B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of producing sodium carbonate from any solution or carbonate mineral, especially trona, that includes: removing calcium and magnesium compounds from an input solution; passing the input solution to a precipitator, adding methanol of 30% to 70% by volume to the solution in the precipitator so as to precipitate carbonate from the solution, washing the precipitated carbonate with a methanol-containing solution, and drying the washed precipitated crystals at low temperatures. The present invention provides a refined technique for reducing impurities and increasing efficiency of the process whereby sodium carbonate crystals can be formed of various sizes, shapes, densities and distributions by adjusting various parameters of the process. The sodium carbonate crystals produced from the process may originate from an input solution comprised of calcined-sodium carbonate solution, tailing pond water, waste pond water, sesquicarbonate or uncalcined trona solution, or from various mixtures of carbonates and bicarbonates.