Soft-Tipped Pole Braking via Elastomeric Friction and Leverage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current braking systems for human-powered wheeled vehicles, such as skateboards and roller skis, are complex, require high skill levels, and compromise balance during braking, making it difficult for users to safely control their speed, especially on hilly terrain.

Innovation Solution

A soft-tipped pole with a large, deformable elastomeric tip that provides increased friction and traction when pressed against the pavement, allowing riders to slow down and maintain balance by leveraging the user's body or a fulcrum element on the vehicle, enhancing braking power and stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If mechanical braking systems are mounted to the skateboard or roller ski, then braking capability is improved, but balance control during braking deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking capabilityVSAvoidbalance control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The braking function is separated from the vehicle structure. Instead of mounting brakes to the skateboard or roller ski, the braking element is held independently by the user's hand, allowing braking force application without compromising balance control through direct body positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The braking system uses an intermediary lever mechanism between the user's hand and the ground. The lever provides mechanical advantage to amplify braking force while the user maintains balance through natural body positioning, avoiding the need for complex mounted braking mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If toe dragging is used for braking, then braking capability is improved, but skill requirement and safety deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking capabilityVSAvoidskill requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides self-adjusting braking through the user's natural hand positioning and body weight distribution. The lever mechanism automatically adjusts to the user's input force and body position, eliminating the need for skilled techniques like precise toe dragging while maintaining effective braking capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If mechanical braking systems with multiple moving parts are used, then braking capability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking capabilityVSAvoidmechanical complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex mechanical braking system is extracted from the vehicle structure and replaced with a simple hand-held lever. This removes multiple moving parts, adjustment mechanisms, and mounting requirements while retaining effective braking capability through a single lever arm and ground contact point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Strength

If hard pole tips are used for braking, then structural stability during propulsion is improved, but braking power and contact area deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidbraking power
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The pole exhibits different material properties at different locations: the shaft maintains rigid materials for structural stability during propulsion, while the tip uses soft, high-friction material to maximize braking power and ground contact area. This local differentiation of material properties optimizes both functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The pole is constructed as a composite structure combining rigid shaft material (for structural integrity) with a soft tip material (for braking). This composite design allows the pole to perform both propulsion and braking functions effectively with optimized material properties at each location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The soft-tipped pole system enables safer and more controlled braking, reducing the risk of accidents and allowing less skilled users to navigate various terrains, including hills, by providing direct rider slowing and improved stability during braking.

Implementation Method 1

The soft tips have an underlying rigid component for structural stability during propulsion, balance and braking

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

A soft-tipped pole with a large, deformable elastomeric tip that provides increased friction and traction when pressed against the pavement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDeformation: Deformation

Implementation Method 3

Increased drag of the pole tip against the rolling surface can be achieved via the use of a fulcrum region for increased leverage and hence increased braking force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Advantage: Mechanical Advantage

Data Source

PatentUS11220244B2Soft tipped pole and braking system for recreational use
Publication Date: 2022.01.11 HERMANN WILLIAM G
  • US11220244B2 patent drawing
  • US11220244B2 patent drawing
  • US11220244B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Soft-tipped pole designs and methods for their use on pavement are disclosed. The soft, gripping pole tip can slow down a roller skier or skateboarder by slowing down the rider directly and by providing increased rider stability during breaking. This is accomplished by the rider pressing one or two pole tips against the pavement, with or without the use of a fulcrum point for increased leverage. The soft rubberlike tip has a large surface area that provides durability as well as variable levels of frictional force imparted against the pavement. The fulcrum for the pole can be the user's arm or leg as well as fulcrum element fastened to the rolling device.