Spark Ablation Device Nanoparticle Production Rate

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing spark ablation devices have limited nanoparticle production rates, suffer from local heating issues leading to large particle formation, and experience continuous discharge at high frequencies, resulting in lost particle characteristics.

Innovation Solution

A spark ablation device with a power source that varies energy levels for continuous and pulsed discharges, combined with a magnetic field oriented perpendicular to electrical field lines, allowing for higher repetition frequencies and even electrode evaporation, enabling higher nanoparticle production rates and consistent particle characteristics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the spark repetition frequency is increased to improve nanoparticle production rate, then the productivity increases, but local heating of the electrodes occurs leading to emission of large particles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenanoparticle production rateVSAvoidparticle size consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic pulsed discharge instead of continuous or high-frequency repetitive discharge. The power source is configured to provide pulsed energy at optimized repetition frequencies, creating periodic sparks that allow the electrode surface to cool between pulses. This prevents cumulative local heating while maintaining controlled material vaporization, thereby producing consistent nanoparticle sizes without the large particles that form under continuous heating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Productivity

If the spark repetition frequency is increased further to improve productivity, then the production rate increases, but discharge becomes continuous and particle generation stops or desired particle characteristics are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenanoparticle production rateVSAvoidparticle generation quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs periodic pulsed discharge with carefully controlled duty cycles and repetition frequencies. The power source delivers energy in discrete pulses rather than continuous flow, ensuring that each pulse creates distinct vaporization events that form nanoparticles. The periodic nature of the discharge prevents the transition to continuous arc discharge, maintaining the breakdown conditions necessary for nanoparticle formation while avoiding the loss of particle characteristics that occurs in continuous discharge modes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Manufacturing precision

If conventional RLC circuit is used with limited repetition frequency to avoid local heating, then particle characteristics are maintained, but the nanoparticle production rate remains limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle size consistencyVSAvoidnanoparticle production rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes key operational parameters including repetition frequency, pulse duration, and energy per pulse to optimize both productivity and particle quality. By adjusting these parameters within specific ranges, the system achieves higher production rates without sacrificing particle consistency. The power source is configured to operate at repetition frequencies and energy levels that prevent electrode overheating while maximizing nanoparticle generation efficiency, overcoming the limitations of conventional RLC circuits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution achieves significantly higher nanoparticle production rates, maintains consistent particle sizes, and prevents electrostatic precipitation, ensuring efficient and controlled nanoparticle generation.

Implementation Method 1

Ablation devices based on electrode vaporization by spark discharge are known in the prior art

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpark discharge: Electric Spark

Implementation Method 2

Electrode ablation is the evaporation/vaporization of the electrode through the presence of plasma, i.e., as a result of heating and ion bombardment

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlasma heating: Plasma

Implementation Method 3

the means to provide a magnetic field provide a magnetic field with field lines that are at least in part predominantly perpendicular to the electrical field lines that cause the discharge between the electrodes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentUS10722287B2Spark ablation device
Publication Date: 2020.07.28 VSPARTICLE HLDG BV
  • US10722287B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A spark ablation device for generating nanoparticles comprising a spark generator; the spark generator comprising first and second electrodes, wherein the spark generator further comprises at least one power source which is arranged to be operative at a first energy level for maintaining a discharge between the first and second electrodes, which power source is arranged for repetitively increasing the energy of the discharge to a predetermined secondary level that is higher than the first energy level for ablating a portion of the electrodes.