SSD Manufacturing Self Test via Virtual Drive Model

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current flash memory storage technologies face challenges in improving performance, efficiency, and utility, particularly in the cost-effectiveness and scalability of SSD manufacturing processes.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a virtual drive manufacturing model that allows system vendors to directly procure components like flash memory devices, enabling cost-efficient SSD production by integrating SSD controllers and firmware with a reference design, and utilizing advanced mapping techniques to optimize storage efficiency and flexibility across various usage scenarios.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If traditional SSD manufacturing processes are used, then production costs are high, but manufacturing efficiency and scalability are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidmanufacturing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs comprehensive self-tests on flash memory devices during the manufacturing process before final assembly, identifying and isolating defective devices early. This preliminary quality assurance action prevents defective devices from progressing through subsequent manufacturing stages, reducing rework costs and improving overall manufacturing efficiency without requiring expensive post-manufacturing testing infrastructure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The SSD controller automatically executes self-test routines on attached flash memory devices during manufacturing, eliminating the need for external specialized testing equipment. The device tests itself through standardized interfaces, reducing manufacturing complexity and cost while maintaining high testing throughput through automated sequential testing of multiple devices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If comprehensive self-testing is performed during manufacturing, then device reliability is improved, but manufacturing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice reliabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The self-test process is structured as a periodic sequence of standardized test routines that can be efficiently executed and repeated. The controller performs systematic cycles of read, write, and verification operations on the flash memory device, ensuring comprehensive reliability testing while maintaining a predictable and optimized test duration that does not excessively extend manufacturing cycle time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

Quick preliminary tests are executed first to identify obviously defective devices, allowing the system to skip more time-consuming comprehensive tests on devices that fail initial screening. This staged testing approach ensures that only devices passing preliminary checks undergo full reliability testing, reducing overall manufacturing time while maintaining high reliability standards

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Quantity of substance

If advanced mapping techniques are implemented, then storage efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The storage space is divided into multiple segments or zones managed by the mapping system, allowing efficient allocation and utilization of flash memory blocks. The mapping technique segments the logical address space from physical storage blocks, enabling better wear distribution and utilization of available capacity without requiring complex custom management logic

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mapping technique implements a universal translation layer that handles multiple functions including address translation, wear leveling, bad block management, and storage efficiency optimization through a single integrated system. This multi-functional approach improves storage efficiency without proportionally increasing complexity, as one mapping mechanism performs multiple critical functions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10803970B2Solid-state disk manufacturing self test
Publication Date: 2020.10.13 SEAGATE TECH LLC
  • US10803970B2 patent drawing
  • US10803970B2 patent drawing
  • US10803970B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A Solid-State Disk (SSD) Manufacturing Self Test (MST) capability enables an SSD manufacturer to generate and load tests onto SSDs, run the tests, and gather results. The SSDs self execute the loaded tests when powered up. The self executing is while coupled to a host that loaded the tests or while coupled to a rack unable to load the tests but enabled to provide power to the SSDs. The rack is optionally cost-reduced to enable cost-efficient parallel testing of relatively larger numbers of SSDs for production. The host writes the tests to an ‘input’ SMART log of each SSD, and each SSD writes results to a respective included ‘output’ SMART log. The commands include write drive, erase drive, SATA PHY burn-in, delay, and stress mode. The SSD MST capability is optionally used in conjunction with an SSD virtual manufacturing model.