Stepped Stacked CFET Gate Coupling for SRAM Latch Cross-Couples

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The semiconductor industry faces challenges in achieving complex signal connections between source/drain regions of complementary field-effect transistors (CFETs), particularly in stacked configurations, which complicates the implementation of latch cross-couple connections in SRAM cells due to the complexity of connecting gate layers of p-type and n-type FETs.

Innovation Solution

The solution involves constructing a semiconductor structure with a stacked and stepped field effect transistor (FET) configuration, where one FET is stacked over the other, with a stepped or tapered device layer, allowing for an electrical connection between the gates of the FETs at the stepped portion, and optionally incorporating a floating gate, to simplify the latch cross-couple connections.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If stacked CFET configuration is used to increase device density, then area consumption is reduced, but signal connection complexity between source/drain regions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearea consumptionVSAvoidsignal connection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from planar side-by-side transistor arrangement to vertical stacking configuration, utilizing the third dimension (vertical axis) to increase device density. The CFET structure stacks n-type and p-type FETs vertically with shared gate, reducing footprint area while the stepped device layers and isolation structures manage the complexity of interconnections in this new dimensional arrangement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Device complexity

If conventional planar FET arrangement is used, then signal connections are simpler, but integration density and device packing efficiency decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal connection simplicityVSAvoidintegration density
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention moves from two-dimensional planar arrangement to three-dimensional vertical stacking, achieving higher integration density by utilizing vertical space. The CFET structure with stacked n-type and p-type FETs connected through isolation layers and contact structures enables this dimensional transition, sacrificing connection simplicity for substantial gains in device packing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Productivity

If stacked CFET with common gate is used, then device density increases, but providing signal connections to lower-level source/drain regions becomes complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice densityVSAvoidsignal connection fabrication
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the device into distinct segmented layers: upper-level FET, lower-level FET, isolation layers, and contact structures. This segmentation allows independent fabrication and connection establishment at different vertical levels, making the manufacturing process more manageable despite the increased device density achieved through stacking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Isolation layers and contact structures serve as intermediary elements that facilitate signal connections between the lower-level source/drain regions and upper-level circuits. These intermediaries simplify the fabrication process by providing defined pathways and interfaces for electrical connections in the vertically stacked configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If FinFET structure is used instead of planar FET, then control over channel and reduction of leakage current is improved, but device structure complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleakage current controlVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The FinFET structure introduces a three-dimensional fin geometry with gate wrapping around the fin, creating a curved/gate-all-around configuration that enhances electrostatic control over the channel. This curved structure reduces leakage current by improving field effect control, at the cost of increased structural complexity compared to planar FETs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Data Source

PatentUS20240186324A1Latch cross couple for stacked and stepped fet
Publication Date: 2024.06.06 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US20240186324A1 patent drawing
  • US20240186324A1 patent drawing
  • US20240186324A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A semiconductor structure is presented having a first field effect transistor (FET) including a first device layer, a second FET including a second device layer, where the first device layer has a stepped portion with respect to the second device layer, and an electrical connection between a gate of the first FET and a gate of the second FET at the stepped portion of the first device layer. The first FET is stacked over the second FET. The second device layer is larger than the first device layer. The gate of the first FET is positioned above the first device layer having a stepped portion.