Face-to-Face Stacked IC Layout With Fewer Metal Routing Layers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increasing complexity and density of integrated circuit chips due to numerous circuit components lead to higher manufacturing costs and design/layout complexity, primarily driven by the need for multiple metal layers for routing.

Innovation Solution

Implementing Wafer-on-Wafer (WoW) technology, where multiple circuit components are distributed across two integrated circuit chips stacked face-to-face, allowing for reduced metal layers by increasing the planar layout area of circuit blocks and sharing power/signal lines.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If the number of circuit components in an integrated circuit chip is increased, then the functional capability is improved, but the routing complexity and number of metal layers increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of circuit componentsVSAvoidrouting complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from a two-dimensional planar layout to a three-dimensional stacked architecture by bonding multiple semiconductor substrates together. This vertical stacking enables circuit components to be distributed across different layers, reducing the routing complexity and number of metal layers required within each individual substrate while maintaining the total functional capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The integrated circuit is divided into multiple independent semiconductor substrates, each containing a subset of the total circuit components. This segmentation allows each substrate to have fewer components and simpler routing, while the stacked configuration provides the necessary interconnections between substrates to achieve the overall system functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If the number of metal layers is increased to accommodate more circuit components, then the routing capability is improved, but the manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverouting capabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of adding more metal layers within a single substrate to increase routing capability, the patent adds vertical dimensions by stacking multiple substrates. Each substrate requires fewer metal layers, reducing manufacturing complexity and cost, while the stacked configuration provides additional routing paths through inter-substrate connections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Quantity of substance

If the number of circuit components is increased, then the functional capability is improved, but the design and layout complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of circuit componentsVSAvoiddesign and layout complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The design process is segmented across multiple substrates, with each substrate designed independently with fewer components. This reduces the design and layout complexity for each individual substrate while the overall system achieves high functional capability through the combination of stacked substrates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent moves the design complexity from a two-dimensional plane to a three-dimensional stacked architecture. By distributing components vertically across multiple substrates, the design and layout complexity within each substrate is reduced, making the overall design more manageable despite the increased total number of components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Quantity of substance

If all circuit components are integrated into a single circuit, then the functional capability is maximized, but the planar layout area required increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional capabilityVSAvoidplanar layout area
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes the vertical dimension by stacking multiple semiconductor substrates to accommodate all circuit components. This three-dimensional arrangement significantly reduces the planar layout area required compared to a single-substrate configuration, as components are distributed across multiple vertical layers rather than spread out in a single plane.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS20230420344A1Semiconductor apparatus
Publication Date: 2023.12.28 NOVATEK MICROELECTRONICS CORP
  • US20230420344A1 patent drawing
  • US20230420344A1 patent drawing
  • US20230420344A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A semiconductor apparatus is provided. The semiconductor apparatus includes: a first circuit, including a first semiconductor substrate, a first group of circuit components formed on the first semiconductor substrate, and a first group of metal layers, wherein, the first group of circuit components are distributed to at least one circuit block, and traces for each circuit block are formed in at least some of the first group of metal layers; a second circuit, including a second semiconductor substrate, a second group of circuit components formed on the second semiconductor substrate, and a second group of metal layers, wherein, the second group of circuit components are distributed to at least one circuit block, and traces for each circuit block are formed in at least some of the second group of metal layers, and the first circuit and the second circuit being face-to-face stacked and bonded.