STAT3 Inhibitor and Checkpoint Blockade Combination Therapy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has limited treatment options, with single agent immune checkpoint inhibitors being ineffective due to a complex tumor microenvironment that suppresses anti-tumor immunity, necessitating a strategy to enhance immunotherapy efficacy.

Innovation Solution

Combining a STAT3 inhibitor, such as WP1066 or WP1732, with one or more immune checkpoint inhibitors like anti-PD1, anti-PD-L1, or anti-CTLA-4 therapies to overcome immune suppression and promote anti-tumor responses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If single agent immune checkpoint inhibitors are used, then treatment simplicity is maintained, but therapeutic efficacy is insufficient due to tumor microenvironment immune suppression

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetherapeutic efficacyVSAvoidtreatment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines a STAT3 inhibitor with immune checkpoint inhibitors to create a combination therapy regimen. This merging of multiple therapeutic agents addresses the insufficient efficacy of single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors by simultaneously targeting both STAT3 signaling pathway and immune checkpoint molecules, thereby overcoming tumor microenvironment-mediated immune suppression while maintaining a manageable treatment protocol

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If combination therapy with STAT3 inhibitor and immune checkpoint inhibitor is used, then anti-tumor immune response is enhanced, but treatment complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanti-tumor immune responseVSAvoidtherapy complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The combination therapy is administered in a segmented manner with specific dosing schedules where the STAT3 inhibitor and immune checkpoint inhibitor are given at different times and frequencies. This segmentation of the treatment protocol allows each agent to be optimized independently while reducing the burden of simultaneous administration, thereby enhancing anti-tumor immune response without overwhelming treatment complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If STAT3 inhibitor is added to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, then immune suppression is reduced, but treatment cost and administration burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimmune suppression reductionVSAvoidadministration ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The treatment protocol employs periodic administration where the STAT3 inhibitor is given on specific days (e.g., days 1, 8, 15) while the immune checkpoint inhibitor is administered on different schedules. This periodic action pattern reduces the cumulative administration burden compared to continuous daily dosing of both agents, while maintaining sustained reduction of immune suppression through consistent STAT3 inhibition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS20220175744A1Combinations of transcription inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors for treatment of disease
Publication Date: 2022.06.09 BOARD OF RGT THE UNIV OF TEXAS SYST
  • US20220175744A1 patent drawing
  • US20220175744A1 patent drawing
  • US20220175744A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided herein are methods of treating patients with a combination of a transcription inhibitor (e.g., a STAT3 inhibitor) and an immune checkpoint blockade therapy (e.g., anti-PD-1 therapy, anti-PD-L1 therapy, anti-CTLA-4 therapy). The patient may have a proliferative disease, such as cancer or psoriasis. The patient may have a pathogenic infection.