Prostate Cancer Diagnosis via STEAP-1 Antibody CTC Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for prostate cancer diagnosis, particularly for detecting circulating tumor cells (CTCs), lack reliability in distinguishing prostate cancer progression and are invasive, with PSA screening showing limited mortality reduction and causing unnecessary side effects.

Innovation Solution

A method involving contacting cancer cells from a blood sample with antibodies specific to prostate-specific markers like STEAP-1, followed by determining the expression levels and calculating a grade score (H score) to diagnose and stage prostate cancer, using techniques such as immunofluorescent microscopy or flow cytometry.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If PSA screening is used to detect prostate cancer, then early detection is improved, but mortality reduction is limited and unnecessary side effects occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprostate cancer detection reliabilityVSAvoidunnecessary side effects
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the detection parameter from general PSA antigen levels to specific CTC characteristics (epithelial markers, prostate-specific markers, viability). This parameter transformation enables more reliable cancer detection while reducing false positives that lead to unnecessary side effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by specifically targeting circulating tumor cells with dual-marker expression (epithelial + prostate-specific) rather than general PSA screening. This localized approach improves detection accuracy for actual cancer cases while avoiding unnecessary screening of benign conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If biopsy is used for definitive diagnosis, then diagnostic accuracy is improved, but invasiveness increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoidinvasiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical invasive biopsy procedure with an in vitro immunophenotyping method using flow cytometry or microscopy. This substitution maintains high diagnostic accuracy by detecting specific cell surface markers while completely avoiding the invasiveness of tissue sampling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses circulating tumor cells in blood as an intermediary to diagnose prostate cancer without directly sampling the prostate tissue. These CTCs serve as a non-invasive proxy that retains the diagnostic information needed for accurate cancer detection and staging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If current CTC detection methods are used, then cell detection is achieved, but ability to distinguish prostate cancer progression is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCTC detection efficiencyVSAvoidprostate cancer progression information
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adds another dimension to CTC detection by implementing a dual-marker screening system (epithelial markers plus prostate-specific markers) instead of single-marker methods. This dimensional expansion enables not only CTC detection but also characterization of prostate cancer progression and origin.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the CTC detection process into distinct analytical components: epithelial marker detection, prostate-specific marker detection, viability assessment, and quantitative analysis. This segmentation allows comprehensive evaluation of CTCs to determine prostate cancer progression while maintaining detection efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach provides a non-invasive, reliable method for diagnosing and staging prostate cancer, predicting therapy efficacy, and monitoring treatment response by accurately identifying and quantifying CTCs expressing prostate-specific markers.

Implementation Method 1

contacting cancer cells of epithelial origin with an antibody that specifically binds to a prostate-specific marker

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAntigen-antibody binding:

Implementation Method 2

determining whether any of the cancer cells express the prostate-specific marker using techniques such as immunofluorescent microscopy or flow cytometry

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow cytometry:

Implementation Method 3

determining whether any of the cancer cells express the prostate-specific marker using techniques such as immunofluorescent microscopy or flow cytometry

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImmunofluorescence: Fluorescence

Data Source

PatentEP2786151B1Methods for prostate cancer analysis
Publication Date: 2019.07.03 F HOFFMANN LA ROCHE & CO AG
  • EP2786151B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2B
  • EP2786151B1 patent drawingFigure 2C~2D
  • EP2786151B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B

AI summary

The invention provides methods for diagnosing prostate cancer. The invention also provides novel anti-STEAP-1 antibodies and uses thereof.